Kindle Problems Offer Insight Into Kiosk, M-Commerce Strategies

Written by Evan Schuman
May 27th, 2010

A good kiosk tries to replicate the charm and persuasiveness of a veteran sales associate in much the same way a well-developed mobile app tries to deliver on the best of in-store and online, enhanced with complete mobility. But what undercuts most of these development efforts is that IT gets so excited by the prospect of leveraging the new, the department is too quick to ignore or give up on the current.

Then customers, who are used to the niceties of that sales associate interaction or the tactile feedback from inside a high-end clothing store, show no interest and developers are baffled. That’s where a bunch of Amazon Kindle developers find themselves today.

Amazon itself—when it used to mostly sell books for a living—patiently did iteration after iteration of “Look Inside” before matching the advantages of a user flipping through a book before buying. But the developers working on the Kindle have not been so lucky. In a series of Kindle tests on college campuses last year, the electronic book reader utterly failed. Why? Because its developers hadn’t sufficiently studied how students use books. It’s a great case for retail IT shops to study.

The Seattle Times detailed the blow-up wonderfully. Although developers believed the Kindle might have some sales challenges in many locations, they felt it would be a shoo-in on college campuses. Why lug a dozen or more heavy textbooks around when the full contents of those books can fit on one 10-ounce Kindle?

But students said the machines wouldn’t let them work with textbooks the way they need to. Users are unable to write notes in the margins, adequately highlight sections or get the most out of color charts and graphics. (We would have expected the Kindle to get that color chart part, actually.)

“You don’t read textbooks in the same linear way as a novel,” one University of Washington student told the newspaper. “You have to flip back and forth between pages and the Kindle is too slow for that. Also, the bookmarking function is buggy.”

Students also complained about the lack of titles available. That fact had been expected, but not the “all or nothing” issue. Some students only wanted the Kindle if it could handle all their book needs. If they have to carry some dead-tree books anyway, the Kindle quickly made no sense to them.

“It’s a classic chicken-and-egg scenario: E-readers won’t gain widespread acceptance on campuses until more content is available and publishers won’t provide more content until e-readers are better suited for college students,” the story said.

Retailers should truly read the full piece, but it’s critical that IT does not think of this situation as merely an electronic reader issue. Kiosks, M-Commerce, new payment devices, CRM programs and 2D barcodes are just some of the technologies that require a sophisticated mastery of what customers like about their current systems.

Developers are typically mesmerized by new functionality, and they are always quite willing to abandon the old. But it’s up to IT management to insist that if you abandon what customers like about today’s old-fashioned offerings, you may find much more resistance than anticipated.

This point doesn’t require a research study or focus groups. Just go into your stores and watch and listen to your customers. Surveys are useless; few customers understand why they like something. A survey of U.S. college students likely would have suggested overwhelming Kindle support, because those students wouldn’t have thought through use of the reader enough to recognize the need to scribble in the margins or to quickly move between chapters. For your development team, you may want fewer software writers and a few more software watchers and listeners.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.