advertisement
advertisement

Post Black Monday, Many E-Tail Sites Still Struggle With Uptime

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 10th, 2008

As the hoopla surrounding Black Friday and Cyber Monday mercifully subsided, some e-tailers were still struggling to keep their sites up, with Office Depot and Sephora suffering repeated outages while Walmart and Office Max—among others—experienced more sporadic mishaps.

The problem with analyzing e-tail traffic—and especially e-tail uptime incidents—is that we have such a narrow view into the environment. Even the top Web tracking services combined only look at a very small number of key sites. That allows us to extrapolate roughly how things are going, but just because most of those sites are calm doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest of e-tail is calm. It’s sort of like trying to project a U.S. national election by looking at exit polls from three major states. It’s interesting, but far from a complete picture.

That said, it’s what we have. Most of the documented slowdowns cropped up on the weekend. Walmart.com first became unavailable at about 3 AM New York time on Saturday. The site was down for about 45 minutes, according to Keynote. But that crash was minor compared to another that began at 5:40 AM and lasted for more than 3 hours. Walmart.com again went offline from about 9:30 AM to 9:53 AM on Sunday, Keynote said.

At least some visitors to the Wal-Mart site during those periods were greeted with this roadblock to holiday shopping: between the times listed below, Wal-Mart posted the following message on their homepage, "We’re Sorry! Our site is temporarily unavailable. We will be back shortly and appreciate your patience. In the meantime, if you need any assistance, please contact us," Keynote reported.

Office Max’s site went down for about a half-hour on Dec. 5, a situation site monitoring company Pingdom suggested might have been a planned pulling of the plug for site maintenance. Even if it wasn’t done on purpose, the Officemax.com outage was a lot less disruptive than the outage that subsequently plagued the site of its competitor Office Depot.

Officedepot.com was down 58 minutes starting at 5:09 AM New York time on Saturday the 6th, reported Pingdom. "This was quite possibly a real outage considering the website responded with HTTP Error 500 (internal server) most of the time," said Pingdom analyst Peter Alguacil. "Also, their Website gave this text: ‘We’re Sorry. We are unable to process this request.’"

Whatever is happening at Officedepot.com might still be happening. The site experienced another 20-minute outage on Wednesday (Dec. 10).

And then there’s the Web site of beauty care product company Sephora. "The biggest issue during the last couple of days" was Sephora, Alguacil said on Monday (Dec. 8). He said Sepora.com "racked up six hours of downtime" over the course of the weekend.

The company was unwilling to provide details and only offered this rather superficial acknowledgement: "Sephora.com experienced difficulties due to unprecedented traffic levels. Sephora is working hard to ensure similar problems in the future are avoided."

The problems began 7:30 p.m. on Saturday (Dec. 6) with an outage that lasted more than three hours. "Technically, it was severe slowdown," said Alguacil, adding that it took significantly more than a minute to download the homepage, "which, for all practical purposes, is downtime. We draw the limit at 30 seconds and even that is quite generous."

He said two additional outages of at least an hour each followed as well as some crashes of shorter duration. "During this time, when we were able to load the page, it often took 20-plus seconds to do so," Alguacil said. "The site became more stable before 1 AM on the 7th when the site went back to normal speed."


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.