advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Target Posts Its Holiday Price-Match Details But Forgets To Link To The Page

October 24th, 2012

Wouldn’t Target want to say: “Don’t buy it from the rival. We’ll match the price, but it will take us four days to get it in”? I can see why customers might decline that offer—why should they wait? But why would Target shut down that option? If the customer is willing to wait, why not?

Target also wisely opted to not trust whatever image customers show on their phones, because it might be a manipulated image. Its shopper instructions: “Please show us your mobile device or a printout from a qualifying competitor’s Web site or Target.com. A Target team member will then verify the match using a Target device.”

Target has started thinking about whether key rivals will start offering CRM-based discounts, and it wants to short-circuit those efforts by excluding any “prices that only display on a Web site after guest login.” Target’s Deede added a more practical reason: Given that “a team member needs to verify the price using a Target device, the price must be accessible without a guest login,” she said.

But matching prices online is still very clearly a lot more difficult than old-fashioned brick-and-mortar price-match programs. True, there’s no online equivalent to “bring in a published newspaper ad,” but Target’s lengthy list of exclusions and limitations looks like a lawyer’s wonderland. And some of the items on that list appear to be made irrelevant by other items on the exclusions list. Target is trying really, really hard to close all the loopholes.

Unfortunately, the result of all that fine print comes across sounding something like this: “Target has a holiday price-match program. But if we can find any possible way at all to refuse to match a competitor’s price, we won’t do the match. Of course, because the only five competitors we’re matching are easily accessible from the phone, we insist that you show us their prices on your device and then you’re free to stand right there and buy from a competitor as soon as we refuse to price match. Thank you for trying and failing to shop at Target.”

Maybe Best Buy’s idea of giving associates the final say on whether to match prices isn’t so foolish after all. It really begs the question: Is rule rigidity—where commonsense need not apply—a better approach than discretion, where the customer isn’t certain whether the price will really be matched? Choose your price-match poison.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.