Wal-Mart, Disney, Visa, MasterCard Named in E-Commerce Micropayment Patent Lawsuit

Written by Fred J. Aun
April 22nd, 2009

Wal-Mart, Walt Disney, Visa, MasterCard and Google are among 20 companies being sued in federal court by a Texas company accusing them of stealing their Patented processing technique in handling their E-Commerce micropayment transactions.

The patent in question is held by a company called Actus and it’s a very specific methodology for handling and sharing the revenue associated with smaller purchases such as, according to an example cited in the lawsuit, Wal-Mart MP3 music downloads.

“Each electronic token is associated with monetary value of at least a fraction of a dollar. The user is permitted to select, at the vendor web site, a subset of products or services for purchase from the vendor,” the lawsuit said. “The vendor web site computes a total price for the selected subset of products or services. The infringing products or services authorize a purchase transaction without requiring third-party authentication, or a physical manifestation of the user account. If the user account contains electronic tokens having a value equal to or greater than the total price, the user is permitted to purchase the selected subset of products or services without requiring the user to disclose personal information to the vendor. The total price is subtracted from the user account, while the purchase transaction is not subject to a minimum processing fee.”

This case is but the latest in a very long line of E-Commerce patent infringement cases, all of which must struggle with proving that the retailer’s approach—which is often dubbed as obvious—specifically infringes on the Patent. But most of these cases tend to settle, typically with the retailer agreeing to license the original patent. Hence, buckle in for quite a few more E-Commerce patent infringement filings.

In the section of the lawsuit naming Bank of America, Actus asserts its patent is being infringed by BOA’s Cashpay Visa Payroll Cards, Visa Gift Cards and Commercial Prepaid Cards. It makes the same claim for numerous gift, loyalty, rebate, payroll and other type cards issued by the defendants as well as for the Google Checkout online payment service.

Another part of the lawsuit says Actus is the exclusive licensee of a different patent (that bears the same name) issued in July 2007. The defendants named in this section, including Western Union and Google, are accused of making, using, selling and offering to sell products and/or services for conducting E-Commerce in a manner that mimics the Patent.

Documentation included with the lawsuit shows the patents were originally filed by a company called PayByClick and inventor Martin Ling, who could not be reached for comment. Actus wants an injunction barring further infringement and, asserting the patents were willfully infringed, it also seeks payment.


2 Comments | Read Wal-Mart, Disney, Visa, MasterCard Named in E-Commerce Micropayment Patent Lawsuit

  1. NM Says:

    Please don’t use “stealing” for patent infringement. “Stealing” implies that someone is deprived of something. The patent troll you’re referring to in this story is not deprived of anything they used to enjoy before.

  2. CPW Says:

    Stealing is the appropriate description for what this is, patent troll or not, when someone takes something that’s not rightfully theirs or doesn’t pay for something that should has value, then it’s stealing. Plain and simple. Music, IP, or otherwise.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.