Walmart Builds Own Search, No Competitive Advantage In Buying

Written by Frank Hayes
May 7th, 2013

Walmart (NYSE:WMT) is arguably the most tightfisted retail chain in the world, constantly driving out costs any way it can. So why is the world’s largest retailer now focused on building its own technology instead of buying it off the shelf? According to the chain’s e-commerce chief, that’s the only way it can get a competitive advantage from the technology.

“We can’t do what we need to do and want to do with off-the-shelf solutions,” said Neil Ashe, Walmart president and CEO of global e-commerce, speaking at a Barclay’s-sponsored retail conference in New York last week. The chain made the decision to insource its IT development last year, and it has opened or expanded three technology centers in the past 18 months near San Francisco, Bangalore and Sao Paulo, Brazil.

One of the first big projects to come from the insourcing is a proprietary search engine that has tighter integration with local stores. With it, Walmart will be able to continuously customize its search without having to wait for outsiders to develop the features it wants. The chain is also beefing up its CRM capabilities.

There’s a longstanding tension between buying and building tech in retail, and it isn’t limited to e-commerce or software. Buying industry-standard products is easier and typically cheaper, but all your competitors can buy exactly the same thing, so there’s no competitive advantage. On the other hand, building it yourself gives you an advantage—plus all the problems that come with being the first tester of your own technology.

That means Walmart is leaving behind the majority of retailers, but joining Kroger (NYSE:KR), which built its own checkout system that automatically scans groceries; JCPenney (NYSE:JCP), which designed its own giant in-store e-commerce kiosks; and Home Depot (NYSE:HD) which went with a custom handheld device for associates instead of an iPod—not to mention Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), which builds its own warehouse robots (and pretty much everything else it uses).

But Walmart is also the primary driver behind a technology project it hopes to get a major advantage from, even as it hopes lots of other retailers will also adopt it. That’s the MCX payment system, which the chain believes will give it leverage over conventional payment-card brands Visa and MasterCard, so it can cut the cost of each transaction. Building your own search engine is nice, but breaking the stranglehold of the card brands would really make do-it-yourself development worth the trouble.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.