advertisement
advertisement

When Prices Can Be Changed On The Fly, What Price Do You Have To Honor?

Written by Mark Rasch
September 14th, 2011

Attorney Mark D. Rasch is the former head of the U.S. Justice Department’s computer crime unit and today serves as Director of Cybersecurity and Privacy Consulting at CSC in Virginia.

What does the “price” of an item mean? If you pick up a can of corn at the Piggly Wiggly and the electronic shelf label (ESL) says it is $1, but the price changes when you walk up to the register, what price is the merchant legally required to deliver? Although any reasonable merchants would likely honor the lower price, must they do so? What about an online store, where the price of an item might easily be changed between the time a customer puts it in his shopping cart and the time he checks out?

There are two different legal precedents for these situations—and in fact, they go in exactly opposite directions. That creates an inherent problem, for both consumer relations and the law. Customers could feel cheated if price changes don’t work the way the customer expects. And as ESLs make in-store pricing work more like online pricing, that could change the way courts see it.

When I was in high school, stock boys were responsible not only for putting items on the shelves but for individually tagging each item (can of corn, $0.35) and ensuring that shelf tags were accurate. This cost the retailers time and money. A few jurisdictions have adopted laws that still require retailers to mark individual items with prices, including California, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, North Dakota and Rhode Island.

But some of these jurisdictions—Michigan, Connecticut and Massachusetts—exempt stores that use new technologies such as RFID and ESLs, which enable the current price to be displayed on the shelf in addition to being embedded in the item when it is scanned.

The focus of government regulation of these technologies, and older technologies like barcode scanners, has been on whether the technology accurately reflects the price of the item sold. Thus, the FTC conducted studies of “overcharges” and “undercharges” as a result of differences between the price on the shelf or on the item and the price charged at the register.

Although ESL systems can be expensive (more than $200,000 to purchase and install), they eliminate this problem because both the shelf label and the register can be updated by the same system, so the price will always be the same.

As a result, retailers can alter prices more frequently, at lower cost to them, based upon any number of conditions. When times are slow, retailers can offer “instant specials”—even time-limited ones. When there is greater demand (say, in anticipation of a hurricane), the prices of generators, batteries, gas cans, dry ice and various sundries can be increased dynamically.

In this way, brick-and-mortar stores can mimic techniques employed by online stores, dynamically altering prices based on market forces. Sounds good, no?

But legally, what exactly does the “price” mean? If it changes between the time a customer puts it in his real or virtual shopping cart and the time he checks out, what price is the retailer required to honor?

The law provides two opposite precedents.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.