advertisement
advertisement

Will Sears’ More Intensive Online Strategy Be Enough?

Written by Evan Schuman
May 19th, 2008

Facing a much tighter financial picture (the latest quarterly report saw comparable net income almost cut in half), Sears has turned to online operations as its best hope for better margins.

Sears on May 15 announced "a large-scale expansion of its online store" with a "nearly quadrupling (of) the number of products available on sears.com."

Sears is in a fascinating online position. On the one hand, the $50 billion 3,800-store-chain says its online numbers are soaring, with the number of unique visitors in February 2008 reportedly rising 20 percent in that month. But Sears.com has also run into quite a few speedbumps, such as a pair of privacy-related disasters back in January.

Its in-store efforts—despite some truly cutting-edge technology trials such as it being the first retailer to test 2-D barcodes—have been the biggest problem.

The chain has recently tried bolstering its online team with talent grabbed from Wal-Mart and Microsoft, a move that is becoming increasingly essential, as the latest earnings figures show a $2.3 billion drop in revenue for the fiscal year.

Imran Jooma, Sears vice president of e-commerce, has been pushing the company’s multi-channel approach, without specifying whether the company has any creative plans for merging those channels down the road.

"As a multi-channel retailer, we want every customer’s experience with
us to be seamless," Jooma said in a statement. "For example, if a customer is in a Sears store and is looking to buy a DVD, and the product is not available, the customer can order the DVD from a computer kiosk in-store and the shipping fees are waived."

But this raises the question of priorities. Is in-store the best channel to distribute movie videos, which can be more easily ordered online with a potentially much larger inventory? Better yet, downloads make far more sense, but that’s assuming Sears is willing to let the products be sold in the more efficient channel, which means it must overcome decades of store-centric thinking.

In the entertainment world that Sears is pushing, they’re not alone. Blockbuster.com is pushing online but is resisting the much-more-logical video download tactic. Indeed, Blockbuster is preparing a kiosk trial in June with NCR.

Netflix is more comfortable with the online video approach, but its efforts are limited to watching movies as a stream—which impacts the experience if the laptop or PC isn’t integrated with a surround-sound entertainment system. Even worse, the number of films available to be seen on their stream is extremely limited, killing much of the intended value-add. If the consumer’s desired film is virtually never available, what’s the point?

The Netflix and Blockbuster examples speak to the challenges that Sears will be facing. Blockbuster’s approach is more easily understood because of its expensive infrastructure. One would like to think that Netflix would be more flexible, but it also has an extensive infrastructure (based on snailmail) that its executives will try and protect. The devil you know.

True change usually comes from either visionaries (usually with deep-pockets they mostly control) or from established players who are facing financial disaster. In today’s world, the threat of bankruptcy is truly the mother of corporate invention. Sears has some very serious decisions to make.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.