advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

NSA Phone Data Grab Raises Frightening Retail Questions. Can Complying With A Lawful Warrant Still Violate A Chain’s Privacy Policy?

June 26th, 2013

The Internet and telephone databases are only a few of the many databases created by commercial entities as a consequence of providing services to their customers. Retailers and payment processors create databases of their own. Every time a payment card is used, a record is created of the exact date, time and location of the card use – down to the tenth of a second. This database, and the dicing and slicing of this database, is useful to retailers and card brands themselves to determine patterns of usage and to prevent or detect fraud, and particularly when linked to things like loyalty cards, which allows the retailer to determine the purchasing behavior of specific individuals over time. Databases are a powerful tool for retailers, processors and, of course, governments.Western Australia

It has been reported over many years that the NSA has also infiltrated myriad other databases. This includes the credit card processing and clearing databases, financial systems’ databases, funds transfer network databases, and many more. Although the details remain few, the database access may run from the mundane (the government issues a subpoena to a party for a specific set of records for a specific individual or small number or individuals) to the sublime (the government gets a pipe into the entire database and searches for and retrieves what it wants.)

Here’s where retailers and database managers can get into legal hot water. What do you do when the government requests or demands information in, or access to a database you have or control? Multiple choice…

(A) Turn over the documents without question – hey, they have a warrant or court order, right? (B) Turn over the documents, but tell your customer that you are doing so and let them fight the government. (C) Force the government to get a motion to compel production, and then comply. (D) Fight the demand to the death no matter how much it costs! You are the defender of your customers’ privacy. (E) It depends on who asks for it, what kind of information it is, why the government wants it, how much it will cost to comply, and whether you can practically inform your customer. (F) All of the above.

I have taken enough multiple-choice exams to know that the answer is always all of the above (unless it is none of the above). Deciding whether or how to comply with government demands for information is a complicated issue. Remember though, YOU are the custodian of your customer’s data. They gave it to you for you to fulfill an order or provide goods or services. Not for you to be the agent of some government to use that data to spy on your customers. Your first duty and loyalty is to your customers. No matter how patriotic you are, remember that, but for your express or implied promises of privacy, the data you are being asked to reveal would not exist if the consumer knew that it was invariably going to be shared with the government.

This is where it gets legally dicey.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.