advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

The Dark Side Of The Cloud: Loss Of Control

February 29th, 2012

Managing new requirements with POS vendors is not a new problem for retailers. I have attended many sessions where I put in my “votes” about which features and functionality I want added to the system. The success of getting my needs to the top of the list largely depends on how many drinks I bought at the bar the night before. (Maybe I should have started a POS Super PAC?) Even if my requirements make the top of “the list,” that doesn’t mean they are going to get done in a timely manner.

I’ve also been in situations where a business need has arisen to change the POS or back office and I have pulled out my checkbook and said, “I want to buy some priority, how fast can you get it done?” only to be told nicely that it will be six to nine months before something is generally available.

But with many cloud-based POS approaches, the problem is made worse, because all customers share the exact same code. A change for one means a change for all. Most traditional POS providers have dozens, if not hundreds, of versions of their code out in the marketplace. They branch out the code to address bugs or customer-specific needs, only to bring it back to the main code base in major releases. It’s a pain-in-the-butt way to manage code, but it is a reality that the big POS companies must deal with.

Although I do believe there are advantages to cloud-based POS, it is important that you understand what flexibilities you will have once you go live. Here are some of the questions you should ask your potential cloud provider:

  • What is your change management process? When are changes implemented, and how am I notified? Do I have any say in the matter for certain changes? Who can request changes?
  • What is your release schedule? Who determines (and by what process) what changes are made to the system?
  • What is your roadmap for the product? How can I formally affect changes to that product roadmap
  • What is allowed for data access from your system? What is the process for requesting and implementing data access?
  • What are the costs for making changes to the system?

Although it’s really not going to do you any good (they will skewer you anyway), you need to present the answers to these questions to your business partners, with a frank dialogue about how this approach will work once you go live. They will likely skim over it as they look at the mouth-watering numbers and still look for your head later. But at least you will be able to sleep better knowing that you tried.

What do you think? If you disagree (or even, heaven forbid, agree), please comment below or send me a private message. Or check out the Twitter discussion on @todd_michaud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.