The Pronunciation Debate: GIF Me A Break

Written by Evan Schuman
May 24th, 2013

In the high-tech and retail worlds, there is a small group of marketers who seem to believe that they control branding and that even after decades of use, pronunciations and nicknames can be changed by marketing dictate. These people are what is known in retail IT circles as “Wrong. Dead Wrong. Absolutely and forever wrong and they were never even the teensiest bit right.” (IT knows not nuance.)

What brings this up is the recent debate—best articulated by our friends at The New York Times—about whether the graphical standard GIF should be pronounced as a homonym with Jif, the peanut butter. (Never quite understood the campaign “Choosy Mothers Choose Jif.” Did that mean that less uptight, less anal-retentive mothers chose Skippy? But I digress.) For decades—since 1987—it’s been pronounced with a hard G, as in the word graphic.

Seems that Steve Wilhite, the inventor of the popular graphic approach back when he worked at CompuServe, now has opted for the peanut-butter pronunciation. It also appears that the actual owners of Jif the spread—J. M. Smucker Co.—have endorsed this new pronunciation, which should have shamed anyone supporting Wilhite’s new pronunciation into silence.

Here’s the problem: After a large community has accepted a pronunciation or a nickname, there’s no going back. Remember Digital Equipment? A huge mini-computer maker in its day, the company was known as DEC (pronounced “deck”). Shortly before the company vanished forever, it made an official campaign to change its nickname from DEC to Digital. Note: They didn’t want to change the company’s name, but just its nickname.

That effort was about as successful as the more recent move by Radio Shack to get people to call it The Shack. Ever heard anyone do that? Me, neither, and the chain has mercifully given up.

The best part of the Times piece is when it quoted a Penn State University linguist named Elizabeth Pyatt. Her theory: “Cultures typically associate a ‘standard’ pronunciation as a marker of status. Mispronouncing a word—even a technical term—can cause feelings of shame and inadequacy. If people believe there is a logical basis for their pronunciation, they are not apt to give it up.”

Not so sure about that second part—what “logical basis” could there possibly be for pronouncing a newly created term with a hard or a soft G?—but the first part is spot on. People just know how GIF is pronounced, and rather than risk being mocked as uninformed, the safest route is to stick with what is common.

Hear that marketers? When a linguist knows your business better than you, time to hang up the tools of your trade. For marketers, I am guessing that’s mostly high boots and lots of shovels.


7 Comments | Read The Pronunciation Debate: GIF Me A Break

  1. kee nethery Says:

    He might have created the format but he is wrong about the pronounciation. When the acronym stands for “Graphics Interchange Format”, the first word has a hard “G”, so the pronunciation is “G” as in Graphics, not “J” as in Jiffy Peanut Butter. If he had claimed “GIF” was “Giraffe Interchange Format” then yes, the acronym would get pronounced with a “J” as in Jiffy.

  2. Simon Bateman Says:

    I have a very strong suspicion that this is simply a publicity stunt to make people aware that there is a person who actually “invented” the GIF(With a hard g).

  3. Steve Sommers Says:

    Hmmm. Maybe it’s a West Coast thing or more specifically a Southern California thing (that is where I grew up), but it’s always been pronounced JIF for me and most everyone I know. Now for something important, pronounce data.

  4. Mark Aggleton Says:

    Jif in the UK was a toilet bleach (among other cleaning products) until a rename 10 years ago – hardly one to associate images with…..

  5. Dave Robinson Says:

    Always called it ‘Jif’ myself, mostly because I hated both Compuserve and peanut butter equally ;)

  6. Brown Says:

    English is a funny language anyways and then this – people arguing over whether it should be JIF or GIF. Should we not fix “BUT” and “PUT” first (if that can be fixed….)

  7. Steve Sommers Says:

    We did, that’s why we have “BUTT” and “PUTT”.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.