advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Forget Interchange Relief—Even Those Developing Mobile Payments Say Banks Will Still Be In Charge

April 9th, 2011

In fact, those people believe banks will just keep getting more central to payments—and so will their interchange fees.

Mobile payments will introduce new entities to the mix, namely mobile operators. But they will not radically change anything. From a payments perspective, it’s business as usual, with just a new form factor of credit or debit card in the shape of a phone. The underlying rails that make the payments happen today will continue to be used in the future.

So what does this mean? When it comes to mobile payments, everyone should take a step back. Beyond the hype, the actual payment part is pretty dull and traditional.

Remember the Exxon Mobil Speedpass keyfob? Exactly. It hardly set the world alight having the means to pay at the pump with a small plastic dongle rather than a credit card. Similarly, it will hardly set the world alight paying with your phone at the point of sale.

Mobile payments are boring. There, I said it.

But the physical act of paying isn’t really the exciting part anyway. The capabilities of current-generation smartphones, in terms of computing power, location awareness, broadband connectivity and subscriber penetration, facilitate entirely new models of interactivity between merchants and consumers. Instead of current-generation checkouts that spew a stream of coupons at you as you have just finished bagging, you can now have highly targeted coupons sent to you in real time to augment the retail experience, indexed to store inventory so that perishable items receive faster turnover.

Or consider dynamic pricing that can change at various times of day to encourage greater consumer throughput. Or that the point of purchase can now be a clerk wandering around with a mobile phone, rather than being stuck behind a dusty checkout.

It’s time to shift our focus from the payments part to the far greater value proposition of what mobile can do to completely restructure the retail environment. If you are thrilled by the prospect of visiting an ATM, then mobile payments are probably for you. Personally, I’d much rather my phone let me know that there’s 80 percent off my favorite all-you-can-eat sushi buffet for the next hour.

Please reach out to me and share your thoughts.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.