Safeway Gets Free Mobile Payment Data, Thanks To Starbucks

Written by Evan Schuman
June 15th, 2011

When Starbucks on Wednesday (June 15) announced a new version of its mobile app for Android, tucked away in a single sentence was a line that the $41 billion Safeway grocery chain will start accepting Starbucks’ mobile payment at its almost-1,000 Starbucks kiosks in July. The Safeway move, though, is the much more interesting part of the announcement in that it’s a clever way for the 1,702-store chain to learn the intricacies of mobile payment without risking its core operation.

The Safeway move required a POS system upgrade to accept the very successful Starbucks mobile card, which is not really true mobile payment at all, in that the phone merely displays the barcode of the Starbucks Card.

But the changes required for the Safeway’s Starbucks kiosks—which are managed by Safeway—were not done for a learning experience as much as to make it easier for people to make purchases, said Teena Massingill, Safeway’s director of corporate public affairs. Still, that makes the free-on-site-training even more compelling, because it’s a true fringe benefit.

Safeway can see firsthand how its customers react to mobile, the impact it has on dollars spent, how clean or glitchy the system is under real conditions and which phones Safeway customers use most often. That’s valuable stuff, considering that Safeway has yet to accept any mobile payment at its front-end POS stations and is actively considering various mobile options.

There are 1,702 Safeway stores across the U.S. and Canada. These include 312 Vons stores in Southern California and Nevada, 112 Randalls and Tom Thumb stores in Texas, 37 Genuardi’s stores in the Philadelphia area and 17 Carrs stores in Alaska.

Target, which was the first retailer beyond Starbucks to accept the Starbucks Card (at Target’s own Starbucks kiosks), was in a very different place compared with Safeway today. Target was already well underway with its own core mobile-payment program for all locations, so the Starbucks data wouldn’t have been that helpful. A cut of the profits of those cappuccinos, though? That’s a very different issue.


One Comment | Read Safeway Gets Free Mobile Payment Data, Thanks To Starbucks

  1. Joshua Greenough Says:

    I am interested to see what happens. I will admit that my first experience wit the new app was not great as I got a force close when I tried to sign up. The unofficial version worked for me the first time. I wish them luck but it was certainly a bad first impression.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.