This is page 2 of:

Where In The World Is ISIS Wallet?

June 24th, 2013

So, ISIS pivots, moving away from its network ambition to a mobile wallet ambition, now partnering with V and MA. What happens then? The WSJ piece that broke the news that month cited its fear of falling behind other NFC rivals (if only they knew that no one was really ahead!). The notion was that by making this shift, consumers would be able to load any card of their choosing into their ISIS wallet, of course after their issuer had adopted the ISIS spec, and those consumers went out and bought a phone and went on an NFC scavenger hunt to find a place to use it. This is 2011, remember. Since today only about 2 percent of merchants have NFC, two years ago, there were even fewer, and even those were highly concentrated in key cities like Manhattan. The pivot from mobile network to mobile wallet solves one problem – but not THE problem needed to ignite ISIS. (My piece CRISIS at ISIS goes into my thinking at the time and all you ISIS history buffs can find it here.)

About a month later, in June of 2011, ISIS confirms that Austin, Texas would be “one of its initial launch markets” during the first half of 2012. Austin was chosen from a short list of 30 to 40 cities it had evaluated as pilot sites! The selection criteria included the “percentage of youthful residents, education levels and willingness to adopt new technologies early.” So, now we know three things: a pilot was still about a year away, cities with old fuddy-duddies as residents weren’t on the short list and having NFC enabled terminals in place wasn’t important.

Fast forward 10 more months and it’s now March 2012. Early in the month, ISIS lines up support from VeriFone and ViVOtech and Equinox to, as one publication termed it, “take over the world,” with each partner promising to provide hardware and software support on their POS devices. This is now 16 months after the initial announcement of the formation of the JV, about a year after VeriFone announced that 25 percent to 30 percent of all merchant terminals in the US would be NFC enabled (remember its at about 2 percent today, so …) and a year before ViVOtech filed for bankruptcy (ah, yes, the circle of life in NFC). And, later that month, ISIS officially “debuts” at SXSW where people can watch cards get loaded into the wallet and see a simulated merchant experience. Technically, there are still three more months until the first half of 2012 is officially over, but as yet no real clues about the real launch.

In between all of the announcement dry spells, two things are happening in the trade press:

  1. There’s a ton of banter around the blogosphere – and I mean a ton – about how disruptive ISIS is and how it and Google Wallet are the hot tickets to igniting NFC mobile payments in the US.
  2. There are hints about when ISIS will launch but no real specifics.

Ta Dah! The next big announcement is in October of 2012, and the one we’ve all been waiting for! ISIS is live in two cities – Austin as promised and also Salt Lake – and available at … tens of merchants and … on as many as 11 handsets (20 they said by the end of the year)! According to people in the Austin market at least, it got off to a rocky start. The lack of handset availability was a problem and many of the participating stores apparently hadn’t received the memo that they were launch partners, since they didn’t seem prepared to accept ISIS transactions.

In January 2013, in an apparent effort to expand the number of handsets that could accommodate the ISIS wallet, it launched something called CashWrap at CES. I can’t believe I missed this, but maybe the lack of post-CES fanfare was by design. This device, which looks like a VHS tape box (check this link for all of you youngsters out there who have no idea what I am talking about) that you pay $60 or $70 to buy. And then put your lovely, sleek iPhone or Andriod device into and lug around to buy stuff at the one merchant in town that you may visit every six months. If you don’t believe me, take a look here.

A month later, in February of 2013, ISIS revealed that its average user in Salt Lake (no mention of how many of them there are) “pays for goods or services with the mobile wallet five times or more a week, follows five different merchants using the wallet’s loyalty card and coupon features, and visits that business twice as often as a regular customer.” I wonder what would happen to those numbers if the Utah Transit System, which supports NFC, was removed from the merchant mix?

ISIS also closed a deal whereby more than 7,500 USA Technology vending machines in both Austin and Salt Lake are enabled to take the ISIS wallet, in an apparent effort to turn those strong cravings for salty snacks into an enabling value proposition to adopt. (Little known fact – did you know that the first vending machine was developed by an engineer in the ancient city of Alexandria, who developed a machine that accepted a coin and dispensed holy water?)

And, just a month ago, in May 2013, ISIS’ Abbott gave a speech in which he told his audience that ISIS is about “making the world clickable,” how people want “magical” moments when shopping and “super easy” payments. And that to make it in payments, providers have to “get the simple things right” and “start with small things that can be done quickly and do them really well.” He also pointed out that all new terminals should be shipped with NFC before the end of the year.

I guess I’ll resist the natural temptation.

So where does ISIS go from here?

Well, I suppose it depends on how much longer Big Daddy Telebucks is willing to fund it.

People have said that nearly $500M has been poured into ISIS, probably making it something on the order of $10M for every ISIS customer (they’d much rather have the money)! To me, it seems hopeless. More than 2.5 years into the experiment, there is little traction, and not much of a value proposition to entice merchants or consumers or issuers to play along. And it’s not going to get better any time soon. Being totally tethered to NFC is a losing proposition, in at least the short run, and there are now too many other cloud-based schemes with momentum for them to compete with. If ISIS had one side of the platform getting any sort of traction, then maybe, maybe it would have a marginal shot, but its quest to solve the hardest problems in payments all at the same time – using NFC as its enabling platform – has resulted in a big mess of quicksand that even $500M more couldn’t get them out of. I take the point that this kind of money to the telcos is pocket change, but it’s also a resource distraction that multiplies their out-of-pocket investment by at least 5x. I would think that their patience would run out sooner or later.

So, I stand by my initial position of a couple of years back. In spite of its namesake, the goddess of fertility, I don’t see ISIS producing lots of mobile wallet offspring. I find it incredibly ironic that the two mobile wallets that pundits thought would change the world, ISIS and Google Wallet, just might after all, but not in the way that they would have wanted. Instead, they could lead the trend away from, and not towards, NFC-mobile wallet schemes. Focusing on the technology and the value created for mobile operators, and not the value created for consumers and merchants, turned out to be the wrong place to put the bet.

I would love to hear your thoughts on the topic .


2 Comments | Read Where In The World Is ISIS Wallet?

  1. Aaron Jaeger Says:

    Where is ISIS? Good question. Google Wallet may not be usable everywhere, but it is available at far more locations than ISIS is. If it wasn’t for the collusion among the ISIS backers, it’s likely that far more people would be using Google Wallet already. And that would get the attention of more merchants which could accelerate the roll-out of NFC terminals.

    Also, you may want to separate ISIS from Google Wallet in the final paragraph when you say ~”putting the needs of carriers before the needs of consumers.” ISIS may have done this, but I don’t think Google Wallet ever did. Google has remained carrier agnostic and just wants its product in the hands of as many people as possible.

  2. Cy Fenton Says:

    You are so right on about their trying to solve all the hardest business problems all at once. The consumer adoption side of this is the key! There is no circumstance where the consumer will think that it’s more convenient to have anything attached to a phone (or a new phone for that matter) to pay when they can do so with the tried and true, always works everywhere credit card. And where are the daddy warbucks wireless companies here? Has ANY of them delivered on ISIS enabled handsets? – Nope.

    If the money to be made here is in the disintermediation of the traditional big credit card companies by setting up an alternate payment ecosystem, ISIS hasn’t found anything in the way of traction there either. To me, Square (and to a lessor extent PayPal) are the ones to watch in this space. They are actually solve both of the problems that folks care about – ease of use and convenience for the consumer, and reducing fees and friction at the cash wrap for the retailer. Square Wallet has the potential and the market share to really make a move on the front side of this problem!


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.