advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Why The NFC No-Show For Apple? It’s The Apple Experience

October 5th, 2011

That’s not necessarily Google’s fault, any more than it would be Apple’s fault (or ISIS’ or PayPal’s). There are lots of independent parts in any payments system, and most of them are outside the direct control of any one player. That’s the joy Google is feeling now. Apple has the luxury of being able to wait until retailers and processors and Google have the glitches worked out.

Then, once Google has laid the NFC tracks, Apple can come in and drive its Magic Kingdom train down the main line.

Does that mean Google gets to decide the de facto standards for NFC payments? Sure—some of them, at least. With more NFC terminals in place sooner than anyone else, Google has already dictated what the POS PIN pads will do—what the interfaces will be and how they’ll connect to back-office systems. Visa will get to set EMV requirements of its own, and Google will play along, because keeping Visa (and MasterCard and American Express and Discover) happy will make Google Wallet stable faster.

Once those de facto standards are settled, Apple can decide whether there’s enough money in the low-margin payments business to justify extending iTunes payments to in-store purchases, riding on top of Google’s network of POS devices. Or Apple could buy into Google Wallet and just keep collecting big margins on phones. Or Apple could cut deals with the card brands to create a mobile wallet of its own.

But when will all that happen? Payments pundits to the contrary, it was never going to happen this week, for reasons every retailer already could have told them. Realistically, Apple’s Tuesday announcement was a product refresh for the holiday selling season—price cuts all down the line, and only one new product, the iPhone 4S, that’s really just a beefed-up version of the existing iPhone 4. They’ll all be in the stores in plenty of time for Black Friday, so the timing makes perfect sense.

Apple doesn’t need the holiday season to move truckloads of phones. That’s why new iPhones arrived in mid-summer in 2007 (iPhone), 2008 (iPhone 3G), 2009 (iPhone 3GS) and 2010 (iPhone 4).

But a new NFC-based payment system? The worst possible time to roll that out would be a month before the holiday selling season starts. Retailers would either have to scramble to support it (you’re going to touch the POS back-end software in late October? Oh, no you’re not) or forgo it until the new year. Most would wait. (There’s a reason Google announced in May and planned its rollout for “the summer,” even if that meant the last half of September. That schedule left time for software tweaks before everything was locked down for Black Friday.)

A payment system that iPhone owners have heard about but can’t use? That’s not the Apple Experience. Even if it worked perfectly where it was installed, it would be viewed as a disappointment or even a failure.

Instead, it’s Google Wallet that will get hammered on this holiday season in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. Customers will blame everything that fails on Google (no matter whose fault it actually is) and by the new year, the worst of the stress testing for Google Wallet’s transaction network will be over.

By June, it might even be ready for the Apple Experience.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.