advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

A PCI Holiday Wish List

December 15th, 2010

I run an annual PCI workshop for the Treasury Institute for Higher Education. We have a PCI deep-dive session, but the greatest benefit comes from the case studies presented by the people who manage their organization’s compliance efforts. They describe what they did to become compliant and what it cost in both time and dollars, in addition to their mistakes and victories. We get great support from the PCI Council, and with the help of industry sponsors we manage to keep the cost surprisingly low. Attendees also love the opportunity to network with others who are facing the same challenges .

My holiday wish to industry and trade associations everywhere, therefore—you know who you are, because we all were in the same room at the PCI Community Meeting when I spoke about this topic—is to add value to your members by offering this valuable PCI training. The Institute’s workshop is not perfect, but I would be happy to share the approach, agenda and anything else to provide a starting point.

Lest you think I am ignoring the merchants, I have a wish for all Level 2 merchants: Get started with your compliance validation now. As every Level 2 merchant should know, MasterCard requires a new validation regime to be completed by June 30, 2011, focusing on an outside assessment of your PCI compliance.

Level 2 merchants can meet this requirement one of three ways: Have a QSA prepare a Report on Compliance (ROC); send someone to the Council’s Independent Security Assessor (ISA) training and have them sign your Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ); or hire a QSA to sign your SAQ. The choice is yours. But whichever path you choose, my wish is that you get started right away.

June will arrive quickly. If your company doesn’t have any ISAs on staff and you choose that route, I suggest you check the PCI Council’s Web site daily so you can register quickly once the classes are announced (Hint: Maybe a Council RSS feed for training classes would be a good idea, too.). These classes are popular, and they fill up fast, so don’t delay.

Alternatively, if you decide to have a QSA involved, start the search and contracting process early. I can just about guarantee a QSA—or an ISA—will question the compliance of some practices and you will have to do some remediation work. All of this takes time, and that is the one commodity you won’t have. My wish for Level 2 merchants everywhere, therefore, is that they have their validation plan in place before they get to go on any holiday break.

My final wish is for merchants of all levels to get more involved with the PCI Council. If you are not already a Participating Organization, consider joining. You will get advance notice of changes and developments, the opportunity to have your voice heard and the chance to join a Special Interest Group. Plus, you even get a discount on training (see above).

Like hopeful children everywhere, I don’t expect to receive everything on my list. But I hope that I will get at least some of my wishes. If I do, it will be a much happier holiday season next year—not just for me, but for everyone in the PCI ecosystem: retailers, brands, associations and the Council.

What do you think? I’d like to hear your thoughts. Either leave a comment or E-mail me at wconway@403labs.com.


advertisement

One Comment | Read A PCI Holiday Wish List

  1. Todd Michaud Says:

    Walt,
    Great column as always. Tis the season, so let me through an analogy at you…

    PCI compliance is a lot like dieting. There are a ton of people out there that know they need to do it, but they don’t. Just like dieting, there is a big gap between knowing what you should do and actually doing it.

    Educating an overweight person about the risks of heart disease, etc. will not encourage them to diet and exercise, no more than educating merchants about the risks of PCI will get them to install a firewall.

    Education is needed, but it is NOT the answer. What is needed is for someone to figure out the secret sauce that creates ACTION. The existing “liability potato” approach is not working.

    I don’t have the answers, but I have some thoughts as to what would help…

    In my mind there has to be financial benefit to becoming compliant and EVEN MORE for those that become secure. Reduce interchange for those who are compliant (versus fining those are not).

    Incentivize POS providers or processors to offer secure network services for merchants. Why couldn’t a processor offer a secure network connection to their facility? Why couldn’t POS provider integrate a firewall into their solution?

    For this to work, the merchant needs to do no more than sign a check. (At least for the Level 4 merchants out there.)

    Just my two cents…

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.