advertisement
advertisement

Apple’s Massive POS Disruption

Written by Todd L. Michaud
June 30th, 2010

Franchisee Columnist Todd Michaud has spent the last 16 years trying to fight IT issues, with the last six years focused on franchisee IT issues. He is currently responsible for IT at Focus Brands (Cinnabon, Carvel, Schlotzsky’s and Moe’s Southwestern Grill).

I am holding a new iPhone4, and I am amazed at what this little device can do for less than $400. But it does make me wonder: With all this functionality, why is it that I am currently spending $10,000 for the technology required to ring up a burrito? Something is out of whack.

I am updating my earlier prediction that cloud computing and 4G would change the POS landscape. I now believe that tablet computers and smartphones will lead the charge to the next POS revolution. Although I still believe that cloud computing and 4G will be integral to the process, the biggest changes will have resulted from Steve Jobs delivering the iPad and iPhone4 to consumers in the first half of 2010.

For $500, I can buy a WiFi-enabled iPad that has a 1GHz processor and 16GB of storage. That is more than enough computing power to run the cashier functions of a POS, yet POS terminals can cost as much as $2,000 each. Do we really get $1,500 worth of value for that system?

The answer is “Maybe yes, and maybe not.” (Harvard Law Professor Arthur Miller once had a panelist say that very same thing during a discussion and he shot back, “Do you really get paid to give answers like that?”) Under the “maybe yes” umbrella, we have to remember the harsh environment where POS lives. How would an iPad hold up to hundreds of thousands of “touches” from a busy QSR? How would an iPad do in an environment where food, water, steam, etc., are standard? Could you manage menus on a 9.7-inch screen instead of a 15-inch one?

Under the “maybe not” answer is this question: How much money does that kind of hardening—or screen size—really cost? If we deconstructed the requirements that drive the costs, would we still “require” them? For example, if you found out that to get a screen size from 9.7 inches to 15 inches would add 20 percent to the cost, would you consider reworking your menus to fit a smaller screen? I’m just wondering if anyone is asking these questions, or whether we are all just blindly accepting that POS units are built a certain way.

Sure you can build your own POS system by piecing together a hardware package and a software solution. But that system is difficult for the franchise-based systems of owners who do not want to be in the POS support business. Most large chains that I am aware of are looking for a company that can provide a scalable solution to thousands of restaurants with one “throat to choke,” if you will. Is that need for a top-tier provider inflating our costs by forcing us to purchase more than we want and need?

I am not saying that the iPhone or the iPad is going to be the next generation of POS. But I am saying that if Apple can deliver consumers this type of technology at a price of $400, then it will only be a matter of time before commercial uses of that technology take hold. Coffee shops are already using iPads and Square technology to service their customers. So far, however, there is nothing mainstream. Why?


advertisement

2 Comments | Read Apple’s Massive POS Disruption

  1. Bri Says:

    Its economics really – iPads sell millions of units, while POS sell thousands of units. High demand + high speed to market = many units sold at a low cost. Low demand and slow speed to market (takes next to an act of god to convince the dinosaurs responsible for POS to adopt/cIts economics really – iPads sell millions of units, while POS sell thousands of units. High demand + high speed to market = many units sold at a low cost. Low demand and slow speed to market (takes next to an act of god to convince the dinosaurs responsible for POS to adopt/change anything at all) = few units sold at what would seem as an unreasonably high cost. Plus – iPads/iPhones don’t need to properly enforce compliancies such as PCI, nor do they have to accommodate ever changing tax rules and other such complexities. If you corelate all of the music, apps, and periferals that you’ll have for your iPads/iPhones to its total value it creeps closer toward what a POS costs.hange anything at all) = few units sold at what would seem as an unreasonably high cost. Plus – iPads/iPhones by default don’t need to properly enforce compliancies such as PCI, nor do they have to accommodate ever changing tax rules and other such complexities. If you corelate all of the music, apps, and periferals you’ll purchase for your iPhone/iPad, the cost creeps closer to the cost of a POS as well.

  2. Tom G Says:

    Our web based POS system (CashierLive) runs pretty well on my iPad.

    The biggest issue is integration with POS hardware including receipt printers, cash drawers, scanners, PIN pads, swipers, etc. Apple has done a fairly good job of locking down the USB interface, but we’re working on solutions.

    Another issue is a commercially available mount that is rugged, safe and attractive. There are a few solutions available but nothing great yet.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.