advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Attacks On E-Tail Sites Over Public Wi-Fi: Just A Click Away

November 11th, 2010

Meanwhile, Firesheep has spawned imitators. One, called Idiocy, is much simpler. It’s a 130-line script that just looks for people using Twitter on public Wi-Fi and automatically sends (for them) a tweet that says “I browsed Twitter insecurely on a public network and all I got was this lousy tweet.” That’s really all it does. It’s pretty innocuous.

But in practice, it’s also a template for any moderately capable programmer who wants to automatically hijack connections to any other online site—including that of a retailer.

No, that threat isn’t at the level of someone capturing payment card data. But suppose someone automatically hijacks a customer’s session and causes your E-tail site to behave erratically—say, searching for nonsense terms or constantly returning to your homepage. Who will the customer blame? It won’t be the guy across the room at Starbucks. To the customer, it’s the site that’s broken.

As a prank by one programmer, that’s annoying. But what happens if that prank goes viral? Remember, the number of people who have downloaded Firesheep is headed toward a million. And the number of customers who shop online using public Wi-Fi keeps growing, especially among smartphone users who either can’t get a 3G signal or would just rather use the free signal.

Yes, it may be illegal. It’s certainly obnoxious. But the only real defense against this kind of session hijacking is for E-tail sites to make every session completely secure.

That won’t be cheap. Creating a fully secure session for each user requires more memory and more processor power to encrypt and decrypt everything that happens, and it also generates more network traffic. (Google claims it has cut the cost down to practically nothing, but most E-tailers can’t use all of Google’s tricks.) That’s why most E-Commerce sites wait until a customer is ready to check out before switching on the security. And in the past, spending for the continuous security hasn’t been seen as a necessity.

But cost isn’t the only problem. Security isn’t just expensive; it also makes things more complicated. For example, Microsoft warned Hotmail users that if they choose full-session security, they won’t be able to use the Outlook Hotmail Connector or Windows Live Mail. Retail sites that are fed from multiple domains may have troubles of their own. And working out those kinks will take time, talent and money.

Still, the price of that improved security will soon have to be balanced against the risk of a damaged reputation and lost revenue. Both of those are likely results of E-Commerce that is hijacked or disrupted by anyone who can encourage users to download and install a relatively simple program.

That’s no longer a question of if, but when. And if Firesheep is any guide, it’s a risk that is really only going to get worse.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Attacks On E-Tail Sites Over Public Wi-Fi: Just A Click Away

  1. Distruptable Says:

    Sorry but its a risk to be using wireless that is not secured properly and does not undergo some sort of modulation of the password scheme.
    Then to be in a public area you are at risk of anything happening to your data transmitted over the open air waves.
    People willing to spend the time to get your data will.
    Same for even being on a land line, it really depends how determined someone is to take your information.

    Open thought and information is good to providing a gifted society that respects each other.
    Ask the founders.

  2. Distruptable Says:

    Secondly, When I saw this on the news page of my tech sites I immediately downloaded it for safe keeping.

    Because yes I want to prove a point to some people that their wireless is junk and that it needs to be disabled or better secured.

    I also have Backtrack4 and have used it to prove that the neighbors are unsecured.

  3. Dymo King Says:

    But isn’t the point of the article that it’s the e-tailers that are potentially going to be targeted by this kind of attack? And they can’t really control what sort of internet connection their customers are using…

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.