advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Best Buy Planned Outages Due To Its Move To The Cloud

April 11th, 2012

Despite the irony of using an Amazon service to more effectively fight Amazon, the move makes a lot of sense. First, only a handful of cloud service providers can scale up to support a BestBuy.com. And second, security issues are an Amazon advantage. Last year, for example, some QSAs were telling merchants that they would not sign off on the cloud for payments unless it was not only using Amazon but using a specific high-end Amazon cloud offering.

It’s not clear exactly how much day-to-day cost the cloud operation will drive out of the E-Commerce site. But Best Buy, like all big chains, needs a lot more capacity a few times a year, particularly during the holiday selling season. When capacity runs short, problems are a lot more likely.

This past holiday season, those problems were catastrophic for Best Buy. First, there was a major foul-up in a promotion for loyalty customers the week before Black Friday. Then there was a high-profile failure in which the Web site took and confirmed orders with guaranteed Christmas delivery, then had to cancel some of those orders as late as a few days before Christmas.

Best Buy had to endure a huge wave of terrible pre-Christmas publicity, and that can’t have helped to pull in either last-minute shoppers or post-Christmas spenders. If the cloud’s capacity flexibility can keep Best Buy out of messes like that, it could provide a major boost where the retailer really needs it.

Bringing control of Best Buy’s IT projects back in-house has the same potential to cut costs by reducing risk. The perpetual problem with outsourcing (and Best Buy outsources a lot of projects) is that the outsourcer’s first loyalty is to its own profits. Hiring hundreds of project managers to oversee those projects—managers whose loyalty is to Best Buy—should keep projects out of some blind alleys and align them much better with what the retailer needs.

Of course, the fate of these efforts is now uncertain. Best Buy CIO Jody Davids was brought in by Dunne in 2010, and it’s clear Dunne supported her in IT investments that weren’t guaranteed to pay off in the short term. A new CEO might decide that chopping 300 recent, expensive hires is a fast way to cut costs and reduce headcount, both things Wall Street likes.

And rolling back the cloud effort, even if it’s well underway, might look attractive, too. After all, those racks of servers in Best Buy’s datacenters are already paid for. The cloud will be an ongoing cost. And having to pay others, including rival Amazon, which must be galling, doesn’t help.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.