advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Best Buy’s Black Friday Cancellations Were “Bait-and-Switch Breach Of Contracts”

January 4th, 2012

UCC 2-301 is pretty clear: “The obligation of the seller is to transfer and deliver [the goods] and that of the buyer is to accept and pay in accordance with the contract.”

Here’s where it gets a bit hairy. Sometimes (say, the day after Thanksgiving) a retailer is offering a product of which there are only a limited number at the advertised price. The retailer can say things like, “only 10 available at this price” or “quantities limited” or “while supplies last.” Of course, there have to be at least some of the items available at the quoted price. At a brick-and-mortar store, it’s pretty easy. When the item is sold out (that is, when the quantity specified or reserved is gone), the sale at that price ends. For an online retailer, the legal situation is thornier. The Best Buy Black Friday door-buster online ad said, “Limited quantities. No rainchecks.”

The problem for the online consumer is that, even though there is a disclaimer saying the quantity is limited, if the retailer has not connected the marketing/purchasing system with the inventory system, the consumer is led to believe he or she has purchased the item and it is available.

It would be like a consumer in a brick-and-mortar store being handed a box, paying for it and then being told weeks later that the box is empty. If the item is truly “sold out” at the quoted price, then two things should happen: First, the online system should not let the transaction be completed. Second, the retailer should cease advertising that price unless it intends to honor it.

Look at what airlines do. They offer fares with “limited quantities.” But when you go to purchase these tickets, you find out they are “sold out.” Indeed, there are no longer any tickets available at the advertised price. Now, if you are taking out a newspaper ad, you have no way of knowing the items will be sold out in the future and you can get away with saying “quantities limited.” But online, if you are still “offering” the product at the price (and particularly as Best Buy did, confirming the sale), you should be bound to honor your contract.

So if I had advice for Miss Cindy Lou Who, I’d say, Merry Christmas to all or else I will sue!

If you disagree with me, I’ll see you in court, buddy. If you agree with me, however, I would love to hear from you.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.