Citi: RFID Is Back (No); Nordstrom Mobile Payment (Maybe)

Written by Evan Schuman
January 20th, 2011

When it comes retail technology sophistication, sometimes culture trumps everything else. How else to explain that Citigroup’s annual report comparing major retailers’ IT sophistication cites the same chains—in the same sequence—as the least and most IT-clever as it did a year ago? Is it really nature versus nurture that keeps Costco, BJ’s Wholesale, Family Dollar, Supervalu and Safeway at the bottom (least sophisticated) and CVS, Walgreens, JCPenney, Target and Kohl’s at the top?

Citigroup has long been considered the most influential technology tracker on Wall Street, so its annual lists are not to be dismissed. IT used to be a backstage corporate function in Wall Street’s eyes, but there are more indicators lately that the money folk are carefully watching the tech folk.

Whether it materializes in decisions about announcing the CIO’s departure or rumors that the next CEO of Home Depot will be chosen based on his or her IT chops, such observation is happening. (This intriguing piece in Bloomberg Businessweek suggests just that, by profiling the home improvement chain’s Chief Financial Officer and saying that her promotion will likely be based on how she handles tech decisions.)

Deborah Weinswig, the Citi Investment Research Managing Director who handles retail, gave the presentation at NRF during one of the RetailROI ( analyst presentations on January 8.

Weinswig, who made a similar presentation last year, pointed to mobile as a good example of where chains are making serious investments. She specifically stressed efforts by Home Depot and Nordstrom. Home Depot’s associates’ mobile devices provide access to all inventory, locate products and handle buy-online-pick-up-in-store purchases, in addition to functioning as a walkie-talkie.

Nordstrom’s move is a bit more subtle, with Citi pointing to its late-2010 rollout of Wi-Fi to all stores, which it said was “setting the stage to enable mobile checkout from within the store.” Nordstrom’s Colin Johnson confirmed that his chain did start installing Wi-Fi for customers in all of its stores in November 2010, but he would not say it the chain plans to use it for mobile payment. When asked if Nordstrom’s would, Johnson would only say: “We’ll see.” (Tesco also announced plans to offer Wi-Fi for all of its stores, but it said nothing about mobile payment.)

The Citi presentation also spoke of RFID “making a comeback in retail. RFID is increasingly being viewed as a solution to store-based inventory management and replenishment issues, rather than merely a supply chain solution.” Here, I offer a contrasting view. Merriam-Webster defines a “comeback” as “a return to a former position or condition of success or prosperity.” Therefore, I think that beyond the supply chain, retail RFID is missing a key prerequisite for a comeback.

Beyond picking at the word choice (don’t even get me started on “solution”), I’m not seeing a lot of retail activity beyond the traditional supply chain. Inventory management and replenishment are fine areas for RFID, but the per-tag costs are still daunting for average merchandise. Also, RFID project proposals have a hard time these days passing the smirk test, given how many times it has been publicly associated with projects that were over-hyped and ended up fizzling away. It’s arguably the best example of “The IT Manager Who Cried Wolf.” Even if RFID really is the best technology in 2011 for an inventory management or replenishment project, it’s going to have trouble being taken seriously.

Getting back to Citi’s presentation, some of the chains seem to have gotten their positioning because of what is needed—or expected—from those segments. Alternatively, if all of the rivals in one vertical have a certain capability, anyone in that segment needs to do the same, even if many other similarly sized retailers do not.

“We consider CVS and Walgreens to be the most advanced from a technology perspective, as the drug retail business model requires these companies to have advanced inventory management and pharmacy workflow optimization systems,” a Citi slide said. “BJ’s and Costco have fewer technology and inventory management needs as a result of their unique business model.”

Weinswig also talked about where specific chains are investing, from an IT perspective. In workforce management, for example, she included Dollar General, Family, Dollar, Wal-Mart and Target among “the clubs, discounters and dollar stores investing in technology.” But for RFID she listed only Wal-Mart. The only chain she listed in mobile was Target. Online had just three: BJ’s Wholesale, Target and Wal-Mart.

It got more interesting when she limited her choices vertically, such as department stores versus food and drug or home improvement stores. In food and drug, Weinswig thought no chain could be honestly said to be investing in next-generation optimization tools, RFID, merchandise lifecycle management or multi-channel integration. In workforce management, she included CVS, Kroger, Supervalu and Walgreens, while both online and mobile had the exact same listings: CVS and Walgreens. Kroger was the only name in the localization/personalization category.

Department stores fared much better, with all five of the chains examined (JCPenney, Macy’s, Nordstrom, Kohl’s and Saks) qualifying as investing in mobile and online. The same group—minus Saks—qualified for multi-channel integration and merchandise lifecycle management. For localization/personalization, it’s the same group minus Kohl’s and Saks. Only JCPenney and Macy’s qualified for investment in next-generation optimization tools, workforce management and RFID.


One Comment | Read Citi: RFID Is Back (No); Nordstrom Mobile Payment (Maybe)

  1. Patrick Sweeney Says:

    RFID – Yes – Citigroup is right; say the leading retailers.

    RFID has emerged (not comeback) as the best technology for high-value items like True Religion or RR jeans at $200 a piece. Companies like Bloomingdales are using virtual fences around their jean corral to completely eliminate shrinkage with great success. Wal-Mart has spent over $150m recently to commit to item level tagging for high-value goods. Other retailers of electronics, fashion, etc. are following suit.

    Tag prices are well below ten cents – which is immaterial on a $500 suit or $200 jeans and the data mining capabilities are tremendous for ordering, merchandising, and anti-shrink.

    Yes, RFID is here to stay it will grow exponetially this year. The savvy retailers know that RFID in social media is next; just look at Vail Resort’s EpicMix ( RFID Program which now has over 45,000 users. Then think about how powerful something similar might be for an affinity program within Nordstroms, or J. Crew? that’s a huge competitive differentiator if you do it right at your store.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.