advertisement
advertisement

Toys”R”Us CRM Foils Another Perfectly Good Theft, After He Takes $2 Million From 139 Stores

Written by Evan Schuman
August 15th, 2012

Being greedy is the telltale sign of a good professional thief, but there are limits. And a pair of shoplifters this week learned that if you’re going to steal $2 million worth of toys from Toys”R”Us—specifically, from 139 stores in 27 states—it’s best to not use a loyalty card. Yes, it was that CRM card that led police to our duo.

Granted, these aren’t the first thieves to be done in by those not-so-loyal cards—a Sears associate got zapped last year—but they are among the best. Seems that Michael Pollara of Florida was hitting quite a few Toys”R”Us stores using the ever-popular box stuffing trick (take a big box with a cheap item in it and replace the contents with something much more expensive). The case was cold, because authorities could not find video of Pollara doing the switch. But a Toys”R”Us loss prevention investigator, Patrick Fairley, got a break on May 9.

One of the stolen items, a specific box of Lego’s, just happened to have only been sold once and that consumer used his CRM card, according to the police report from the Broward County Sheriff’s Office. A check of the CRM records showed purchases in 139 different Toys”R”Us locations across many states.

Fairley, who worked with his mother, then converted the stolen items into cash by selling them on eBay. (eBay, Where America Fences.) Police went online and purchased one of the items from him and placed surveillance on the return address.

Not only have police accused him of an impressively high number of Toys”R”Us thefts, but he also was accused of hitting KMart, CVS, Walmart, Michael’s, Office Depot, Books-a-Million, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Staples, Barnes & Noble, JCPenney, Hallmark, Home Depot and Jo Ann Fabrics.

Come to think of it, maybe this guy should be using his loyalty card.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.