eBay Playing, And Losing, The Retail Prediction Game
Written by Evan SchumanFor many years, Microsoft top brass entertained Silicon Valley by predicting when it would release an important application and never getting the date right. Many other ISVs did the same thing, but Microsoft was the master. Microsoft played Lucy to the media’s Charlie Brown. Unfortunately, the company never figured out the huge downside to predicting software releases. eBay CEO John Donahoe is trying to bring back some of that old Microsoft humor.
In Donahoe’s case, he has been trying to predict what major retail chains will do. Back in July 2011, he confidently told investors that eBay would announce a major retail trial by the end of 2011—that was Home Depot, which wasn’t announced until January 2012—and that 2012 would bring 20 national retail trials. Last week, Donahoe slashed that figure almost in half, now saying that 10 to 15 retailers will be offering PayPal in-store this year. Asked to explain the different numbers, he told a TV interviewer: “We tend to under-promise and over-deliver. So no, I wouldn’t say we’re scaling back at all.”
Setting aside the fact that he didn’t answer the question, this is impressive spin. Donahoe had been promising 20 and he’s now scaling it down to 10 to 15, which means he’s now promising 10. That’s not under-promising. It’s over-promising. And it’s not over-delivering, because none—beyond Home Depot—have been delivered yet. If Donahoe announces 28 retailers next week, that would be over-delivering.
The issue shouldn’t be under-promising at all. It should be, “Why is he promising?” Even with eBay paying for everything, retailers will roll out—or not—at the last minute and on their own timetable. Investors understand that and would gladly accept, “We’re talking with several major chains and we’ll tell you as soon as we have anything concrete.”
What Donahoe also didn’t address are the growing security concerns of the Home Depot trial. Home Depot clearly is happy with the eBay-funded effort, given that it made the unusual move of expanding the PayPal offer to the full chain. But will other chains be as happy if their fraud losses are not covered by eBay? Maybe eBay should start releasing its PayPal fraud losses from the Home Depot rollout? Now there would be some stats that 10 to 15 chains might find very interesting.
March 7th, 2012 at 2:00 am
So, eBay is buying PayPal’s way into these retail chains. Not surprising. Regardless, that any retail chain would contemplate getting involved with PayPal shows how little they know about payments processing and, in particular, that they know absolutely nothing about the clunky PreyPal.
March 7th, 2012 at 10:02 am
What’s wrong with trying to make life a little easier on folks? If I can pay with a mobile number and pin why would I not want to do that? Sure it may be something that seems a little clunky at first, remember the old “Lisa” apple computer? Everything has to start somewhere. And complaining about it illegitimately without facts doesn’t help me, you or anyone else.
March 8th, 2012 at 12:41 am
A PayPal “mobile” payment is not easier than a NFC card “tap and pay” card payment. And, what is all this constant beat-up of “mobile” payments about, anyway? When you go out, do you take your phone with you but leave your wallet/purse at home? Does your phone have a little pocket to carry your driver’s licence, etc? I’ll take the security of my NFC “chip and pin” MasterCard, in my wallet, any day, thanks …
March 8th, 2012 at 2:44 am
Oh, and I forgot another material difference between Visa/MasterCard and PayPal at POS, with my MasterCard I can make a “debit” payment or get “cash out “directly from my bank account (assuming I’ve got some funds in the account). See if PayPal, or any of the other “non-bank” payment processors can do that …
And, when Visa’s V.me is up and running later this year, bank-issued card users (including bank-issued Amex) will be able to pay online by “debit” card. Merchants are looking forward to that possibility …
In the western world, where suitable infrastructure exists, do we really need any of these “mobile” middlemen complicating the payment process and probably voiding any statutory protections that may have been available to you had you paid directly by a credit card?