advertisement
advertisement

Firm Takes On Challenge of Check, Credit Card Purchases in the Field

Written by Evan Schuman
March 20th, 2006

With more home deliveries and installations, retailers and restaurants are facing the point-of-sale challenge of verifying payments away from the POS while paying higher credit card fees for card-not-present purchases.

Commerciant, a Houston-based wireless paying processing house, is coming to the aid of those merchants with the introduction of a combination unit that wirelessly authenticates and processes both check and credit card payments.

The firm is positioning the unit?dubbed the Mobilescape 5000?as one of the first remote units that can process both payment forms. How well the $900 device works is unknown, but analysts say that the need for such a device is real.

“This is a huge deal,” said IHL Consulting Group President Greg Buzek. “This allows mobile professionals and delivery personnel to verify funds while at the consumer’s premises. If something is wrong, they can get another form of payment right there rather than having to track down the people again. This is a huge money saver for the companies that do these kinds of services.”

Buzek believes the check-writing portion is new. “There have been some that were pushing an idea of cellular modems and such. Today, most all call in the numbers to a home office, thus taking up some other person. I don’t know of any big rollouts, but I know Domino’s has been looking at this for a couple of years.”

The check verification portion does not check the customer’s bank account, but merely looks for the customer’s name on a list of known check bouncers. If the customer’s name is not on that list, it assumes the check is valid.

“The check [packages] for retail are really only suitable for in-store,” said Commerciant CEO Timothy Davis, because the units are too heavy and require too much power for them to be used off-site.

Davis said his company got around the weight and power issue by eliminating the motor and allowing the check to be pulled through by hand. The trick was to have the check’s scan heads be able to accurately read the check with the imprecise jerks and stops that hand-pulling typically delivers.

The new unit “uses a patented system for variable velocity scanning, which reliably converts the check information to an electronic payment,” Davis said.

Many merchants handle the credit card authorization by simply having the customer phone in the credit card number so that it can be verified before the delivery is made, but that exposes the merchant to the more expensive card-not-present interchange fee. By pulling the card through directly in the field?with a real-time wireless connection?the merchant is charged the lower card-present rate.

Davis claims that another differentiation with his system is the Mobilescape 5000’s ability to store those signatures at the company’s server, which allows for later online retrieval by the merchant, for dispute resolution. Commerciant today allows such access for three years, but the company may significantly reduce that soon, Davis said.

“There has been some discussion of what extent we might shorten that for storage reasons” to “maybe something like nine months.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.