advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Google Joins The Same-Day Delivery Crowd, But It’s Still Not Fast Enough

October 31st, 2012

It’s not even just pizza anymore. Many cities now have restaurant-delivery services. On Wednesday (Oct. 31) Burger King announced it is extending its Washington, D.C., delivery trial to Miami. Target delivery time: 45 minutes. Typical delivery charge: $1 to $2. That’s a long way from what Amazon, Walmart and Google are offering.

It appears ebay is the only same-day experimenter that currently understands this idea, claiming it will complete deliveries within an hour for $5. We don’t know whether that’s actually happening, but suppose it is. Then ebay only has one problem: Nobody in retail believes ebay can actually afford to deliver items from other chain’s stores inside an hour for $5. Walmart, for example, is running deliveries out of its own stores and requires a four-hour lead time and a four-hour delivery window—and still charges $10.

Why? Probably because ebay really can’t make money at this. It would have to launch a whole new business to turn a profit, in any case. That means the stakes are low, and ebay can afford to burn through its budget for the trial. (Google is in much the same position—if anything, it has even less skin in the retail game than ebay.)

On the other hand, Walmart (like other brick-and-mortar chains) has a huge opportunity in same-day—make that same-hour—delivery that leverages the advantage of all that existing, expensive real estate. It’s an advantage that Amazon can’t beat—Walmart’s stores are literally so much closer to most customers than Amazon’s DCs that Amazon can’t possibly win that race.

Maybe that’s what’s making Walmart hesitant to push its own delivery trial as hard as it pushes its suppliers. The stakes are high, and that’s making Walmart skittish.

The irony is that, at its core, this is about logistics and integration. It’s 90 percent IT, and Walmart has already solved 90 percent of the problems. Walmart has systems to optimize how to make deliveries. It knows how to track inventory and fill orders. It has site-to-store in place. In principle, the chain just needs to tack on quick delivery, guided by tweaked logistics beamed to a smartphone in the delivery guy’s car.

In practice, it’ll be harder. And Walmart has never been in the pizza business, so on-demand same-hour delivery may sound impossible. Being just slightly more convenient than Amazon, and only a little more expensive, sounds a lot more appealing.

But every chain that has ever gone up against Amazon should know that being only slightly better won’t work. And every chain that has tried to force customers to change their expectations should know that’s also a losing game. (Ask JCPenney about coupons or any chain about contactless cards.)

It’s easy to rationalize that customers won’t mind waiting hours for a long delivery window to roll around—after all, same-day is still a lot better than next-day, right? Except after more than three years, hardly anyone even remembered Amazon’s “order by 10:00 AM and we’ll deliver by 8:00 PM” same-day program until the Financial Times rediscovered it this summer. Hardly sounds like a customer favorite, does it?

Yes, customers will mind waiting, especially once they make the comparison to food delivery. And yes, chains—especially Walmart—can probably figure out how to make this work so it’s about as fast and cheap for customers to pay for same-hour delivery as it is to drive to the store.

But not until they wake up and smell the pizza.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.