advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

How To Lose 500,000 POS Terminals

November 16th, 2010

In the words of U.S. District Court Judge David G. Campbell, who handled the most recent legal round: “TSYS asserts that the 1-800 number awarded to EPS by the arbitrator does not exist, and that EPS’s merchants in fact are connected to TSYS through seven 1-800 numbers that are shared with hundreds of thousands of non-EPS merchants. TSYS argues that giving EPS control over these numbers will put these third parties at risk and will cause TSYS to be in breach of its other client contracts.”

Too late, Judge Campbell ruled last week—you should have brought up that issue during arbitration, when you knew about it and EPS and the arbitrator didn’t. Now you’re obliged to turn over control of all seven of those toll-free numbers to EPS.

To recap: TSYS started out believing it was owed $1 million in 2007. Three years later, it owes $2.6 million and seven phone lines, and has a lot of explaining to do to the merchants using half a million of its POS terminals. And EPS is still using TSYS’s services, at least until TSYS gets all the EPS merchants on the same toll-free line and gets those other TSYS customers off that line. Got all that?

Yes, it’s a ridiculous situation. It arose from a promise that TSYS never intended to keep, and has just gotten messier as TSYS kept trying to wiggle out of the situation.

It’s that sort of behavior that makes retailers and acquirers a little queasy. After all, they depend that payment processor. If the processor’s business judgment is poor and corners are cut in one area, who knows what else may be happening along the way?

That’s the real risk for the retailers caught in the middle of what, remember, started out as a billing dispute. They simply don’t know what’s going on. They have to trust their processor.

In this case, money—and time—will eventually solve the problem. TSYS may not be happy renting a new toll-free line and sending out new POS terminals programmed to use that line to EPS’s 56,000 customers. But if TSYS is smart, it’ll start doing that now, because even if it ultimately wins in court, it will still have to somehow disentangle EPS’s merchants from its system.

On the other hand, if TSYS was smart, it would have started doing that years ago—and probably would be done by now.


advertisement

One Comment | Read How To Lose 500,000 POS Terminals

  1. billblack Says:

    These must be stand alone dial up terminals? Regardless, fantastic article!

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.