advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Mobile Payment In Eurasia: More Than A World Apart

May 10th, 2009

A common theme among contactless and mobile payment trials is that the plans are often less aimed at taking transactions from credit and debit cards than converting cash purchases into electronic transactions. In the French Payez trial, they are trying to figure out the amount limit to require a PIN.

“If the amount is less than EUR20, the customer simply places the phone in front of the terminal and the payment is made and the receipt is printed out. The process is similar to that of the contactless cards such as MasterCard’s PayPass, Visa’s PayWave or, in the U.S., AmEx’s Expresspay. If the amount exceeds EUR20, the participating customers in France enter a PIN on the mobile. To complete payment, the shopper then places the phone in front of the terminal once again. The payment is made and the receipt will then be printed out,” the report said. “The promising combination of passive mode for small amounts and active mode for large amounts seems to be a sensible support for the retailers’ aim to phase out cash. However, not all stores participating in the French Payez Mobile are willing to risk unauthorized payments of below EUR20. In these cases, the customer has to activate a ‘pay’ function on the phone’s menu, enter a PIN and finally place the phone in front of the terminal. Compared with earlier WAP or SMS-based forms of mobile phone payment, this procedure is very lean, user-friendly and, last but not least, very quick.”

In Japan, some major chains have taken trust-but-verify to the next level. A couple of years ago, the largest grocery retailers in Japan, AEON and Seven & I, both started their own mobile electronic payment systems called WAON and Nanaco.

“Differently from the European approaches, the Japanese Nanaco and WAON e-cash systems are pre-paid,” the report said. “The customer first has to top-up the card or phone before using them for payment. If a mobile phone is used, its credit can be topped up from anywhere using a credit card.”

Germany’s Metro Group has been pushing mobile payment for years. Metro Group gave about 100 customers Nokia mobile phones, but they had to “feature not only NFC technology, but also cameras with auto-focus. Only with auto-focus are the phone’s cameras able to replace laser technology for barcode scanning,” the report said. Metro also had to make sure that the in-store systems, which gave customers product information and the latest pricing discounts, would be automatically deactivated once the consumer left the store “to prevent competitors from gaining access to sensitive pricing information.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.