Mobile Security Achilles’ Heel: Employees Won’t Report A Lost Phone For A Very Long Time

Written by Frank Hayes
February 17th, 2011

Say you’re a retailer whose associates use iPhones or iPads in-store to help customers check inventory or check out. Now suppose a tablet goes missing. How long will employees wait before reporting that it’s gone? If it’s more than a few minutes, you have a problem.

Last Wednesday (Feb. 9), two German security researchers said they’ve developed a way to strip a stolen iPhone of most of the passwords stored on it in about six minutes—even if the phone is encrypted. That’s so fast that a phone or tablet could easily be stolen, stripped of data and returned before its owner even notices it’s missing.

Worse still, employees aren’t inclined to report a missing device instantly. That’s just human nature. They’ll probably go looking for it first—and if that search lasts as little as 10 or 15 minutes, the passwords and other security-related data on it could be long gone.

The security researchers, from Munich’s Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology, said they used widely available software tools and a Windows PC to jailbreak the stolen phone and then run a small script that collects encrypted passwords. But they don’t have to break any encryption themselves. “The decryption is done with the help of functions provided by the operating system itself,” they wrote. “An attacker would not need to know the user’s passcode, nor would he need to exploit new vulnerabilities to reveal these secrets.”

In other words, the data theft happens so quickly because it uses the iPhone’s own operating system to do the heavy lifting. From a passcode-protected and locked iPhone with no other vulnerabilities, they were able to extract passwords for company Wi-Fi and VPN, E-mail, voicemail and Google Mail, among others—all without visibly damaging the phone, and all in about six minutes.

Clearly, it’s time to rethink how you deal with lost equipment. By definition, smartphones and tablets aren’t nailed down, the way traditional point-of-sale equipment is (or should be). How hard is it for a thief to palm a mobile device while an employee is distracted, walk out the door and into a McDonald’s or Starbucks a few steps away, hack the mobile device in minutes and then slip back into the store and casually leave the device where it will be found?

By that time, the employee may have noticed the device is missing—or is it just misplaced? If it only takes six minutes to grab a group of potentially useful passwords, an employee can spend 15 minutes searching for the device in the time a thief can steal, hack and return a smartphone or tablet.

A few weeks ago, a colleague here at StorefrontBacktalk had a conversation with a very senior IT exec at one of the larger chains and the subject of mobile security came up. The exec was unconcerned because, as he said, “We remote wipe those phones the instant we learn of it.” No doubt that’s true. But the first thing thieves do when they steal an iPhone is to remove the SIM, so a remote wipe becomes impossible.

Besides, wiping a phone only works if you believe employees will alert IT the instant a mobile device turns up missing. That’s simply not the way people function.

You know that employees will search for a few minutes at least.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.