Mr. Mayor, If That’s Your Real Name. NYC’s Hizzoner Has Moniker Swiped

Written by Evan Schuman
October 2nd, 2007

Were one of a mind to argue that identity theft is not a big deal and true victims are hard to find, it’s probably not a good idea to make that case in New York’s City Hall these days.

The Manhattan D.A. announced Tuesday that New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg had his identity grabbed and placed on some bogus checks totaling $420,000, written to be drawn on the Mayor’s personal bank account at the Bank of America. Distict Attorney Robert Morgenthau said the suspect, identified as Odalis Bostic, had done his research and had the checks issued in the name of the mayor?s financial manager, Geller & Company, according to this story in The New York Times.

But in what prosecutors said was an unrelated incident, someone else tried taking $10,000 from the mayor’s same personal bank account at Bank of America. This time, though, it was an online transfer to an E*Trade account. From there, that other suspect, Charles Nelson, was accused of using his debit card to make cash advances.

The details aside, it’s hard to imagine many consumers who would have more security protection than Mike Bloomberg, who is both a billionaire, the mayor of the nation’s largest city and a longtime media mogul (Bloomberg financial wire).

If Bloomberg’s bank account and other authentication details can be accessed, what chances do the rest of us have? This just might give the identity theft people the posterchild they’ve been needing.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.