advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Never Mind Google’s Crumbling Cookies, It’s Retailers Who Are At Risk

February 22nd, 2012

What may be just as problematic is the fact that cookies can no longer give a retailer a competitive advantage. All your competitors use them, too, and in pretty much the same way you do.

Then there is the real downside. Right now, you know that you probably have at least a decade’s worth of cookie-using code in your E-Commerce systems. What you don’t know is what cookie-based tricks your developers (or third-party contractors) have used over that decade or so. Say there’s a cookie crackdown, and you clean up all the sketchy cookie practices you know about. If there’s old code in your system that sneaks a cookie in despite a customer’s preferences, you’ll eventually be caught, sued and investigated, probably in that order.

Ironically, there are several better ways to do what cookies currently do badly (because so many customers try to block them).

One is to track customers by way of their browsers and other characteristics of their computers or phones, but without putting a tracking cookie on the customer’s machine. That requires more server power than simply using cookies. But it neatly sidesteps all existing cookie controls, because you’re not putting anything on the user’s machine or retrieving any data from it.

For example, a project by the Electronic Frontier Foundation has found that at least 80 percent of customers can be uniquely identified without cookies, just by using a handful of characteristics reported by the Web browser, including time zone, system fonts and browser plug-ins. That’s 80 percent of all customers, not just the ones who aren’t blocking cookies. That rises to almost 95 percent if the browser has Flash or Java enabled.

A second approach actually improves security for customers: doing every E-Commerce session using Secure HTTP, which creates an encrypted tunnel for the customer’s transaction. That chews up more processor power, but it means no one (at least in theory) can hijack the customer’s online shopping session or eavesdrop on product choices or payment information. Lots of E-tailers already use Secure HTTP at checkout time; extending it to your entire site means you just happen to gain the ability to track each customer.

Then there’s a third approach: Just ask customers to identify themselves when they arrive at your E-Commerce site. Offer a carrot, such as special offers for customers who sign in or allow you to use cookies or other Web-tracking technology. If they say no, they can still shop—they just don’t get the bargains. If you already have a brick-and-mortar loyalty program, maybe that just means adding a box for the customer to type in that number, rather than requiring a user ID and password.

Considering how willing most shoppers are to sign over large quantities of CRM data when they sign up for a loyalty program, that seems like a reasonable bet. And with loyalty programs getting more popular as tracking cookies come under more suspicion, that may be the easiest way of getting out from under the Cookie of Damocles.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.