New PCI Stats Show First Time Drop In Level 1 Compliance

Written by Evan Schuman
May 26th, 2010

New PCI DSS compliance stats for the U.S. released by Visa on Monday (May 26) showed—for the first time—a drop in the compliance rate for Level 1 retailers, albeit a tiny one, from 96 percent to 95 percent. But it’s significant in that Level 1—the largest chains in the Visa empire—has always shown a steady increase and, at worst, a plateau.

The exact number of retailers in Level 1 was 360 chains in the figures released this week, which is the exact same number that Visa reported last month. Last month’s report covered activity through Dec. 31, 2009, and this week’s figures are current as of March 31, 2010. Those results suggest that four of last year’s complaint chains no longer are, bringing the number of non-PCI-compliant major chains up to about 18.

The other Levels examined showed identical figures from the prior report, with Level 2 still at 94 percent and Level 3 staying in the vague classification of “moderate.”

With the number of chains covered being constant, there is still the possibility—albeit remote—that one or two chains dropped out of the Level 1 category and that the same number moved up from Level 2. The much more likely scenario is that four merchants lost their PCI certification. Are there new breaches that we’ve yet to learn of? Did those chains have assessments that turned up serious new deficiencies?

It might even be something as innocuous as multiple chains changing assessment firms, with the new firms using a more strict interpretation of the guidelines. New initiatives in mobile could also open some larger chains to suddenly being found non-compliant. Indeed, some chains have already discovered the perils of new platforms.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.