advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

PCI Finally Addresses Vending Machines, Phones And Kiosks That Take Cards. For Retailers, Though, It’s Still Tricky

October 19th, 2011

The loyalty and confidence you’ve built with your brand will come back to haunt you.

The PCI Council’s new rules, insofar as they go, are quite strong and necessary. Our concern is solely with the “insofar as they go.” Without the context of a timeline and related rules, this document may certainly offer a comforting tech list of what manufacturers have to include in upcoming releases, but it offers little concrete comfort to retailers.

Also, for some manufacturers, those new lab fees to PCI (don’t kid yourself: With every device that needs to be tested, tweaked and retested, those fees will add up to some non-trivial totals) may push for price increases.

How much are the fees? Well, the lab fees are whatever the market will bear, another PCI document reports. “All testing-related fees and dates are negotiated between the vendor and laboratory, and the vendor pays all fees directly to the laboratory. If a discrepancy requires the vendor to modify the physical design of the payment security device or the firmware, the payment security device must be resubmitted for a new test cycle and the laboratory will invoice the vendor accordingly.”

But PCI still gets its cut, which is understandable. Beyond the lab fees, “vendors are assessed a $2,000 fee for every new evaluation report received. In addition, vendors will be assessed an annual listing or maintenance fee of $1,000 for each existing PCI approval. All initial evaluations under a major version (e.g., 2.x, 3.x, etc.) of the security requirements for a given product shall constitute a new evaluation and shall receive a new approval number and be billed accordingly.”

On the plus side, retailers can certainly set their own timetables. “As of X-and-Y date, we will accept no systems that don’t comply with the new PTS rules, with lab results to back it up.” But how much of a delay—especially with mobile devices—is any chain willing to accept? That’s why this timetable needs to come from PCI or Visa, so that the delays—if any—can be equally forced on all chains and all of their rivals.

The PTS rules tie directly into last month’s release of new Point-to-Point Encryption rules that are not slated to kick in until Spring 2012. Those P2PE changes dropped the number of requirements P2PE-compliant chains must worry about, all the way from 12 to merely two requirements.

But based on the released PTS guidelines, there is no timing listed.


advertisement

One Comment | Read PCI Finally Addresses Vending Machines, Phones And Kiosks That Take Cards. For Retailers, Though, It’s Still Tricky

  1. Steve Sommers Says:

    PCI’s timing is perfect. They release their PIN guidlines for kiosks approximately two weeks after the Durbin Amendment killed the small ticket purchase rates. I know, this guildline is not kiosk specific, I just find the timing kind of amusing.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.