advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Police: Best Buy Let Porn-Poster On Its Network. No Hacking Involved

March 20th, 2012

As a practical and a legal matter, there are issues with the associate-approval method. Given that the smartTVs are designed to receive direct wireless transmissions from consumer-grade mobile devices (smartphones, tables, laptops, etc.), restricting access may be futile. From a legal standpoint, though, at least Best Buy wouldn’t have been making it ultra-easy. Best Buy’s facilitation of this impromptu bachelor party entertainment is what may cause legal headaches.

There’s an even more frustrating legal problem with the associate-approval concept: It might have the opposite of the intended impact. What if a Best Buy employee saw these inappropriate images and decided to approve the display anyway? At least a customer self-serve porno portal leaves the Best Buy attorney wiggle room to argue that the chain had no idea someone would do this. If an associate approved it, Best Buy would be in an even weaker legal position.

It’s similar to the legal problems of people who host parties where alcohol is served. In a series of so-called host liability decisions, the question of whether hiring a professional bartender puts the homeowner host in a better or weaker legal position was argued. Paying for a pro bartender makes the host look more responsible and more caring. That drink-mixer could watch for signs of guests who have had enough and cut them off, while also alerting the host to confiscate car keys of some guests.

But if an accident happened, the bartender’s hiring could make a jury hold that homeowner to a higher standard. That professional should have known that the guest was drunk and stopped him or her. A party where the alcohol was all self-serve might endanger guests more, but it could better enable the homeowner to plead ignorance. If he didn’t know about it, he couldn’t be expected to have done anything about it.

Some of those issues also exist for retailers trying to sell smartTVs. There’s also the ultimately simple resolution: Do as TV displays have done for years and simply show the identical ultra-high-quality video on all of the sets and let customers compare that way. It may not be as impressive, but it’s a lot safer. Then again, the whole point of the program is to boost sales. The idea of seeing your personal videos on this TV—to better judge how it will look in your living room with your content—is a compelling reason to drive down to your local Best Buy.

The legal debate is not entirely different than the debate over reader reviews and whether retailers should approve them before publishing.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.