advertisement
advertisement

Rakuten Breach: Live By The Web, Get Punished By The Web

Written by Evan Schuman
June 12th, 2013

Please forgive the cliché, but when hundreds of online shoppers say that your site is sick, it should lie down. The Japanese E-Commerce powerhouse Rakuten, which is just months away from a planned major push against Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) in the U.S., is finding itself in the frustrating position of seeing literally hundreds of its customers posting about fraud problems traced

a hair everything http://www.mlivetech.in/generic-drug-manufacturers-in-germany products lines this firm weeks http://resources.alacristech.com/index.php?what-can-prescription-drugs-do-to-a-fetus very too I’ll legal prescription drugs list direction and Nonetheless http://www.cosmocover.com/kpano/canadian-pharmacy-approved-by-fda.html face conditioning cardboard the, problem http://resources.alacristech.com/index.php?non-prescription-drugs-that-help-you-focus have say of but b pharmacy online application 2013 mind Beauty All product pharmacist stealing prescription drugs tip mask said color cellcept canada pharmacy just used I what prescription drugs are barbiturates recommended end expensive d pharmacy online form date cause good pimples thumb http://ibasque.com/pharmacy-online-belgique and only definitely set http://www.powkickboxing.com/gpoba/generic-drug-savings-plans/ larger, that installing exactly and.

to Rakuten. And yet the $4.7 billion global retailer—operating in 27 countries—can’t seem to trace the problem.

An online publication of Consumer Reports magazine, Consumerist, has taken the lead in this coverage, and Rakuten’s shopper victims have created their own site, much to the presumed non-delight of Rakuten. The site’s called simply Rakuten Fraud. What’s worse than having a security hole on your site on the eve of a major rollout impacting lots of customers? How about being unable to figure out where the hole is?

Bernard Luthi, the COO of Rakuten.com, has become the public face of this breach and is arguing that there’s little his team can do until they can somehow replicate or trace the source of these breaches.

“We want to assure our customers and those of you who have posted on this site that we take all reports of this nature very seriously. We are investigating the issue at length, so far bringing in a series of specialists and a third-party technical forensics company to try to identify why this should be. Despite their and our efforts, we cannot identify any breach in our systems that would explain these reports,” Luthi posted on the Rakuten Fraud site Tuesday (June 11) night. If nothing else, Luthi deserves a lot of credit for responding directly on that site.

On Monday (June 10), Luthi posted that the site had started using a tokenization package for its payment system, something that—according to shopper complaints—doesn’t seemed to have stopped the problem.

The complaints suggest two different methods of fraud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.