Rite Aid Cuts Deal For Visually Impaired Web, POS Support

Written by Evan Schuman
May 2nd, 2008

Rite Aid on May 1 announced an extensive set of E-Commerce and POS changes to accommodate visually-impaired consumers, admittedly under an implied litigation threat from advocacy groups.

The $24 billion 5,000-store pharmacy chain joins an expanding list of national retailers who have agreed to make such changes, including 7-Eleven, RadioShack, Safeway, Trader Joe’s and Wal-Mart. The most prominent retailer who has fought such efforts is Target, whose legal battle continues.

The changes typically sought—and Rite Aid is a good example—involve making all informational images readable by devices those with visual challenges use. Many sites will use, for example, an image of a shirt to serve as the entry point for the shirts area.

Under the terms of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), such images must be tagged with meaningfully descriptive text that visually challenged consumers can use.

There is active debate within the E-Commerce community whether such change requests are overly onerous and expensive or very important to a substantial population. Either way, such changes can often help consumers who are not visually challenged, but whose browsers might not be properly displaying images. These tags have the side benefit of helping those consumers, as well.

The agreement was flexible on Rite Aid’s use of CAPTCHAs (those squiggly lines that consumers recognize and type in to prove that they’re not computers), which pose a significant challenge for consumers with vision difficulties who in some circumstances can’t use a speaker to hear the word being spelled.

On the in-store side, Rite Aid agreed to purchase and install thousands of new POS units that allow PINs to be entered in such a way that the consumer can’t be watched typing in the digits. The typical new POS units use touchscreens, which allow for much more flexibility in capability design, but the units create a hardship on those with vision difficulties.

"Without tactile keys, blind people are forced to share their PINs with strangers," said Melanie Brunson, executive director of the American Council of the Blind.

The keys on the specially created POS units are designed so that visually impaired consumers can easily recognize them. Every store is to have at least one such unit.

The units will be installed by the end of next year, according to the agreement between Rite Aid, the American Council of the Blind, the American Foundation for the Blind and the California Council of the Blind.

The deal said that Rite Aid has already purchased "more than 3,000" such POS units from VeriFone.


One Comment | Read Rite Aid Cuts Deal For Visually Impaired Web, POS Support

  1. Wayne Brown Says:

    The issue is not just visually-impaired. My disabled experience came with 5 years of IT support for the Virginia Department of Rehabiliation Services (DRS). Take a look at Target’s payment transaction terminal. I can’t believe that they haven’t been sued for equal access by a person with limited hand/arm dexterity. Oh, how about self-checkout lines… not very accessable.

    I believe that as retailers automate more and more on the consumer-side, we will see more litigation.

    Wayne Brown
    President, C.T.O.
    Point-Of-Activity, Inc.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.