advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Sears’ Mobile: Focusing On The Consumer Who Doesn’t Have A Smartphone

October 19th, 2011

There’s also a key sales point behind the scenes here. Years ago, in the early days of in-store kiosk strategy, the popular approach was to use the kiosk to replace floor associates or, to be nicer, make do with far fewer store associates. However, it didn’t take long for store execs to realize that consumers didn’t like being pushed off on a machine, as though associates were saying: “Get away from me, kid, until you’re ready to buy. I have more important things to do.”

But when those same associates started using the kiosks as sales tools—by standing with the customer, handling the kiosk controls and using it for demos, product searches and whatnot—sales took a decidedly northward spike.

By arming floor associates with the devices, it not only frees customers up—and enables those who don’t have smartphones—but it puts the control back into the hands of the sales associates. That’s one way to discourage sales from slipping away to Amazon or JCPenney.com.

Sears is rolling out the Apple devices slowly in the U.S., starting with 449 stores, according to the chain. Although opting to not say when it expects those initial deployments to be in place, the upcoming holiday season certainly suggests it will be completed quickly.

“The rollout is happening now, and we hope to have it completed by the holidays,” Freely said.

At 449 stores, that represents about 13 percent of the roughly 3,500 Sears and Kmart stores in the U.S.

Sears’ announcement also said that the chain would be offering free Wi-Fi at 377 stores.

The idea of pushing Wi-Fi is a solid one. But where many have dropped the ball—and we haven’t seen anything from Sears yet to indicate that it has addressed this—has been on consumer handholding. There are three parts to that. First, making sure any smartphone-possessing customer who walks in the door understands that Sears has a free Wi-Fi network for their unlimited use. Second, making sure the customer knows how to use it. (That second one is going to be needed by an increasingly small population, but they do still exist. Signage and associates need to talk about how to access the store’s Wi-Fi for various smartphones.)

But the third issue is the most critical: convincing customers it’s safe. In consumer-friendly language, mention the security precautions that will protect them from any malicious fellow Wi-Fi shoppers. Without that third one, many shoppers will simply say “thanks, but no thanks” to the free wireless ride. And there goes all of those mobile-friendly new sales.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.