advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Sears’ Move Into IT Services: A Baffling Step If You Think Of Sears As A Retailer

April 25th, 2012

Probably the best articulation of the investment versus traditional retail argument came from James Tenser of VSN Strategies. “Sears Holdings’ strategies are hard for people like us to quickly grasp, because we persist in viewing them through a conventional retail lens. Better to discard the merchant frame of reference and try to take this on its own terms. An asset is an asset. A profit-generating spin-off may be worth pursuing, or not, depending upon the alternative uses available for investment capital,” among other factors, he said. “If existing Sears and Kmart stores require costly, high-risk investment and huge tie-up of capital to generate value, but MetaScale’s data services can generate high returns with modest capital, well, then, the choice becomes clearer. It’s no different from some other chains that have focused on real estate investing over merchant profits in the past. Yes, we’ve all heard the conventional wisdom about sticking with one’s core area of expertise. But Sears Holdings is an investment vehicle first.”

MetaScale itself is officially a wholly owned subsidiary of Sears Holdings, albeit one with a lot of management overlap with Sears. It lists Phil Shelley as its founder and CEO, but Shelley’s day job still is Sears’ Chief Technology Officer. Oddly, neither Shelley nor any other MetaScale employee was quoted in the news release announcing the venture. That honor was given to Sears CIO Keith Sherwell.

A Sears internal comparison document made it clear that Amazon’s cloud operation is what Sears sees as the main rival for MetaScale customers. The comparison paints Amazon’s offering as a “This is what we’re offering. Take it or leave it” package, with MetaScale positioning itself as more of a custom shop, pushing custom security and encryption along with code development and implementation consulting.

If this is viewed as an unrelated business for Sears Holdings—given that it’s a legal wholly owned subsidiary, which is certainly a fair view—it’s another IT shop offering to sell its services.

A Consumerist piece this week offered a great reminder why a healthy amount of distance from Sears retail is not necessarily a bad thing.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.