advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Sensitive Data On Phones And Tablets Can’t Be Erased, Researchers Say

February 24th, 2011

Unfortunately, that old page hasn’t actually been erased. The sensitive data is still there—just not accessible through the “flash translation layer,” the circuitry that makes flash memory look like a disk drive. There’s no way for a program to kill that data.

But it’s relatively easy for a thief who steals a thumb drive to pry it open, connect the flash memory chips to an under-$1,000 homemade reader and resurrect most of the data—payment card numbers, personal customer information or whatever else is supposed to have been deleted.

If that seems unlikely, remember that thieves have hacked together some very sophisticated hardware to steal payment card data. The UCSD researchers said a copy of their own flash-chip reader “would require only a moderate amount of technical skill to construct.”

Indeed, the researchers said the only way to be sure that data was deleted from a flash-memory device was if the manufacturer specifically designed a “secure delete” function into the drive—and then that function would probably only work reliably if it was erasing all the flash memory in the drive. And that’s not likely to happen for all flash drives any time soon. For the cheapest ones—thumb drives—it may never happen.

What does that mean if you’re going to use iPhones or iPads in your store? Don’t store any sensitive data on the flash-memory “drive” in the mobile device, even temporarily. Apple’s i-devices use regular programming memory that can be securely wiped, so it’s probably safe to hold a payment card number in memory momentarily while a card is being swiped. But storing it on the device’s flash drive? Not safe—even a remote wipe won’t reliably clear that data.

Of course, in practice, the price of an iPhone or iPad actually provides a little bit of security (though only a little). Dismantling the device to sift through the flash-memory chips will almost certainly destroy its resale value. And there’s no guarantee for a thief that there will be anything useful hidden in the mobile device’s memory. It’s a gamble, and maybe—maybe—a thief will go for the quick profit instead of the long-shot.

Still, making sure programmers don’t use flash storage for any unencrypted sensitive data is probably a good practice in any retailer’s IT shop.

But thumb drives? They have no resale value. They’re cheap, easy to disassemble, have no remote-wipe function and are routinely used for carrying unencrypted data. That makes them unsafe for any type of sensitive information—and the perfect target for thieves.

No one in your business should be using thumb drives. And good luck getting rid of them.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.