advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Squeezing More Value From Your PCI Assessment

March 25th, 2010

Next let’s consider the benefits of storing cardholder data. We need to make one point clear from the start: The card brands do not require merchants to keep cardholder data. That is the case, no matter what you may have heard. Your acquirer or processor may need to keep the data, but if you choose to do so, I hope you are getting something in return.

You definitely should keep what I call “payment data,” which includes date, amount, name, and either the first six or the last four digits of the PAN. All this information is out of scope for PCI, and the data can be used to locate any card transaction from your acquirer for chargebacks or refunds. So far, then, your benefits from storing PAN data add up to $0.

Some retailers keep PAN data for loyalty programs or other post-purchase applications. Re-coding these applications to use a different identifier will cost money. Your risk assessment should lead you to ask if you might use a secure one-way hash instead of the PAN.

The hash will be unique to the card, and it also will be out of PCI scope. It will cost to change your systems to use the hashed values, but that amount may be a lot less than the cost of storing and protecting all those PANs.

The hospitality industry presents an interesting challenge, as hotels like to retain guests’ PANs after checkout to cover any additional charges. The business case here is whether the benefits of the late charges for those $2 bottles of water (that the guest will dispute anyway) outweigh the costs of retaining the PAN data. There may be situations where keeping cardholder data makes sense. For example, hotels might want to retain it when housing rock groups that trash their rooms on a regular basis. But I have seen cases where, as much as we tried, the hotel could not cost-justify storing the data based on post-checkout charges.

The risk analysis you prepare for your PCI compliance presents yet another opportunity to reduce your risk and costs. If you decide to keep 60 days of PANs for exception item processing as a favor to your acquirer, maybe you can reduce that to 30 days. If you use PAN data for velocity checking or loyalty programs, maybe you can use a hash value instead.

Whether or not you act is almost secondary. The key thing is to use the work you have done to ask some direct questions. How you choose to answer those questions can have significant implications on your risk profile and your budget.

How do you use your PCI risk assessment? Whether or not we agree, I’d like to hear your thoughts. Either leave a comment or E-Mail me at wconway@403labs.com.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.