Staples’ Reusable RFID Trial Expanding

Written by Evan Schuman
December 14th, 2007

A one-store RFID trial that Staples ran this summer with reusable tags has been declared a success by the retailer and will expand to four other stores in mid-February, said the retail chain’s IT executive in charge of the project.

The initial Staples Canada trial was an attempt to see if the key argument against more-expensive active tags—which would typically cost between $5 and $8 apiece—could be defused. Historically, retailers have avoided using such high-end tags on merchandise that didn’t cost more than $100, greatly limiting how much it could be used.

Theoretically, a reusable tag—which is removed at the point-of-sale—could radically change the chip’s economics.

Joe Soares, the director of process engineering for Staples Canada and Business Depot, said his team evaluated the trial and concluded the cost-per-use—over a five-year lifespan, assuming the chain paid the full market price—was eight cents.

Beyond the cost per-use, Soares said the trial continuously delivered a 100 percent accurate read-rate and delivered a "21 percent reduction in out-of-stocks for the items that were counted."

The chain also saw "zero percent shrink" on the tagged items, which Soares said was especially noteworthy because the tagged items high-theft-targets such as MP3 players, laptops and desktop PCs. "Those items are the ones that are very hot. They are high profile," he said. "With it being a closed system, we knew right away if something was gone."

The chain will mimic the initial Montreal trial by only tagging a very small percentage of each store’s SKUs. "We tested 1,500 SKUs and we are going to expand the same project to the additional stores," Soares said. "The results were so great that we wanted to see if it was replicable throughout the chain."

In the initial trial back in June, the chain paid nothing for hardware costs because the costs were covered by supplier partners, including Fujitsu and AbsoluteSky. For the trial expansion to four more stores, Staples is paying the hardware bill, but Soares indicated the rates they were charged by their suppliers were quite low. "The costs are indicative of them wanting to do business with us," he said.


One Comment | Read Staples’ Reusable RFID Trial Expanding

  1. Chris Kapsambelis Says:

    Strictly speaking, the ability to know immediately when something is missing only refers to the reusable tag, not the item. For the tag to be reusable it must of necessity be easily removable. Even a dumb thief will know enough to leave the tag behind.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.