The Data Breach Librarian Actually Gets Paid

Written by Evan Schuman
May 9th, 2008

The Florida librarian and data breach victim who successfully took Wells-Fargo and Sprint Nextel to small claims court was paid this week, something that some data breach observers doubted would ever happen.

Theodore Karantsalis had filed the lawsuit for several reasons, but one was to prove that consumers would fare far better—faster, easier and more money—in small claims court than as one of many in some class-action litigation.

He received the credit notice from Sprint for $756 and was told that it would be paid directly as a check. "It is probably a lot more than those who participate in class-action cases ever get," Karantsalis said. "I hope this empowers others to seek justice in their respective small claims courts with similar issues."

He makes a good point, but some of the success of this case is explained by flying under the data breach radar. The huge class-action lawsuits filed on behalf of retail data breach victims against companies such as TJX involve literally dozens of lawyers, a huge number of defendants and expensive witnesses, depositions and investigations.

Small claims courts sidestep all of that. Yes, the dollars are certainly less, but for the consumer, is it really less? How many of the class action defendants in TJX or some of the current retail breach cases will end up getting more than $796?

Part of the problem with consumer data breach incident lawsuits is that zero liability credit-card programs are effectively removing any direct cash losses. Without provable financial losses, there’s little that civil courts can typically do. Given that, small claims cases are arguably the most viable defense an individual consumer likely has.


One Comment | Read The Data Breach Librarian Actually Gets Paid

  1. Roger Dawson Says:

    Most excellent! The guy got paid. Where did all the folks who said this wouldn’t happen go?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.