advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

This Year, DDoS Attacks Are Shorter, Hit Harder And Aim At Things Like Shopping Carts

October 18th, 2012

Best of all, from the attacker’s point of view: The traffic required to bring down a shopping cart is invisible to monitoring systems designed to spot brute-force attacks.

It’s not just shopping carts, adds Stuart Scholly, president of Prolexic. Anything that causes a database lookup or triggers a script will work as a high-leverage attack: product searches, repeated logins (whether they’re valid or not) and running videos, for example.

From the point of view of legitimate customers, it doesn’t look like the site is under attack—just that it has slowed to a crawl, presumably because the retailer doesn’t know how to run an E-Commerce site. And if attackers can identify how an E-Commerce site is communicating with its payment provider and interfere with transaction confirmations, customers can be left in limbo.

Think of how Target’s new site collapsed in the face of a huge amount of traffic on Missoni Tuesday last year—except instead of being triggered by huge sale crowds, it’s from malicious scripts fired off from a handful of attacking servers.

And the more effort your developers have put in to create a rich E-Commerce experience that leverages lots of CRM data, the more processing power each new item in the shopping cart requires—and the harder a low-and-slow attack is going to hit you.

What can you do? You can’t rip out and rebuild your whole E-Commerce system. Fortunately, you don’t have to. But you will have to get your E-Commerce developers out of the mindset that network security will spot and handle all the DDoS attacks.

What E-Commerce developers have to do is write code that watches for suspicious signs: items added too fast to a cart, a customer who is suddenly starting multiple videos or launching product searches unrealistically fast, or really anything causing an error. “If a user’s requests are causing problems, you can rate-limit that user,” says Akamai’s Ellis. Or do user validation: “When you see ‘interesting’ things, you can throw in CAPTCHAs to make sure it’s not a script.”

That may be something E-Commerce developers do themselves, but they’re probably better off handing the questionable “customers” off to the security team to throttle back the ability to click. (This could have the interesting result that the site’s responsiveness really does slow down—but only for the attacker.)

Besides, it’s really security’s job to deal with attackers, both brute-force and low-and-slow, while developers think about real customers—something like the way in-store associates focus on customers while LP watches out for theft.

And that’s where the LP lesson comes in. The jobs of associates and LP are unquestionably different, and it’s not an associate’s responsibility to handle thieves.

But when they need to, they can still talk to each other. That’s not always the case with developers and network security. From now on, maybe it had better be.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.