Trick Or Treat? New PCI Version To Be Here By Halloween

Written by Evan Schuman
May 16th, 2008

By this Halloween, the PCI Council will unveil the first major revision of the PCI DSS payment card security program in two years. But with the council not releasing any true details about the changes, nervous retailers are truly wondering "Trick or Treat?"

Robert Russo, general manager of the PCI Council and a man who never met an acronym he didn’t like (when we chatted, he tried turning QA into a verb—and he frighteningly got darn close), is trying to play down the significance of the new version, describing the modifications as "minor changes."

The new guidelines will be PCI DSS version 1.2, a mild bump from version 1.1 that was published in September 2006. The council had been considering a rhetorical jump all the way to 2.0 but, Russo said, they concluded that not that much needed to be changed.

"We happen to think that the standard is pretty damn good the way it is right now," Russo said. "It goes to the feedback that we’ve been getting. It’s as good as it is without needing to make a major overhaul."

That said, Russo stressed that the new tweaks they are making will be mostly in three key areas: wireless; application security; and penetration testing.

One of the reasons for the vagueness is that the council is still deciding on particulars. Also, Russo said an advantage of participating in the process is to get early looks at the proposals.

Some of the changes will involve clarifications on requirements and "there will be some things about the reports and what we are looking for in the reports." In wireless, for example, Russo said current wording about WPA and WPA2 and WEP—which suggests that networks need to use both—will be changed, but he couldn’t say what it will be changed to.

"The ambiguity is going to be much, much less," he said. "Today, lots of things are open to interpretation."

Russo also addressed a common retail concern when a new version of PCI is discussed; namely, that it will suddenly cause compliant merchants to become non-compliant. "We are not trying to get merchants to be out of compliance," Russo said.

Truth be told, the council does seem to have a plan for implementing anything new gradually. Changes are optional for several months, to give merchants time to adjust without risking a loss of compliance.

That’s a fair approach. As he discussed it, however, I couldn’t help but envision a paraphrase of a favorite Aaron Sorkin line. Retail CIO: "Why do you think it’s your job to try and get merchants out of PCI compliance?" PCI Council GM: "I honestly don’t think it’s part of my job. It’s more of a fringe benefit."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.