advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

PCI-Less Card Payments: Square’s Mobile Scheme

May 25th, 2011

There are also the practical advantages, such as losing all those paper receipts, a lower interchange fee (for smaller chains and solo-location merchants), easier online reporting stats and the “Get Out Of PCI Free” card. Of course, to truly get out of PCI, the retailer would have to only accept cash, checks and Square. Just one direct Visa charge and it’s, “Hello PCI Paperwork.”

Todd Michaud, the IT VP for Focus Brands (Carvel, Cinnabon, Schlotzsky’s, Moe’s Southwest Grill, Auntie Anne’s and Seattle’s Best Coffee Int’l), is skeptical of whether Square Card Case will do much business beyond the 50-merchant trial, especially when the excitement dies down.

“The fact is that my guess is that a large portion of the people with readers are people like me (and I do have one) who got it for the coolness factor, tried it a few times, but rarely use it,” Michaud said. “This is the Jack Dorsey hype-machine in over-drive. I saw the same thing happen with Twitter. Their PR machine told everyone how popular it was to make it popular. I guess Square got some coverage at the NRA (National Restaurant Association) show this week, getting all the restaurant companies buzzing. I can’t wait to see what happens when the small restaurant companies dive into this, because it’s cool, and then a 16-year-old waitress drops three iPads in a week and the restaurant has to buy new ones at $700 to $1,000 a pop.”

Conway agreed with Michaud’s concerns. “The ‘cool’ factor has led to many people I know getting their Square and, after they showed it off, it sits in a desk drawer. I really like [Michaud’s] dose of QSR reality that many dreamers may be missing.”

Conway also expressed concerns that, with such a tight margin, it won’t take many surprises to derail it. “One thing to watch will be exception items like chargebacks and disputes that can ruin their profit model,” he said. “They’ll blow through the 2.75 percent—especially on low-ticket items—pretty quickly.”

Given the concerns mentioned above and the logistical challenges—not to mention that Square isn’t even initially trying to push this capability for major chains—it would seem to have little near-term impact on retail payment or PCI. But that assumption would not be correct. One of the merchants involved in the trial does not accept any payment cards and limits its tendering to cash, checks and Square. That makes the theoretical retailer able to have customers see charges on their credit-card bill while still avoiding PCI very real.

It means it can be done. Would a tweaked master merchant approach work for major chains? Let’s not lose sight of the fact that Visa—one of the original, and arguably the strongest, backers of PCI—is a financial backer of Square. This much is without debate: Between the telecom carriers fumbling over themselves trying to deal with direct payments and the backroom efforts, mobile payment is going to be getting very interesting for the next year or two.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.