advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Using NFC, Carriers To Secure Mobile Payments? Ann Taylor’s CIO: “The Most Exciting Thing Out There”

March 6th, 2011

“We’re not advanced in that capacity. We’re probably the retailer that is farthest behind. But we’re going to do the same thing that everybody else is doing. If you authenticate on our HomeDepot.com site and we retain your credit card, then we’re going to process you the same way,” Kinzey said. “But we’ll offer you—if you don’t want to log in that way—the alternative methods. At some point, we’d like to get to what you’re talking about, it’s just probably three or four years out for us.”

Pizza Hut CIO Baron Concors, another panelist, applauds these possibilities. But he stressed that chains should slow down until mobile standards are clear.

“My personal opinion is that I do think it has great potential. But I think that we have to wait until a standard evolves, especially here in the U.S. What you don’t want to do is hitch your wagon to some train that ends up being the Betamax to the VCR,” Concors said. “We need to wait for the device saturation to occur and then figure out how a standard evolves here in the U.S.”

In our podcast on the security topics from the discussion, a concern was raised about wireless hotspot detection and how mobile payments will have the interesting side effect of making the job of tracking rogue wireless connections almost impossible.

“What will happen is the IT helpdesk will have to go in and manually remove all of those rogues. So when you’ve got hundreds of sites—especially in malls or urban locations—it doesn’t take much before the system gets totally overloaded,” said Richard Nedwich, retail head at Meru Networks. “Now square that as mall properties continue to deploy wireless and the stores in the mall continue to deploy their own wireless and shoppers in the mall bring their Wi-Fi smartphones with personal hotspots into the mall. In New York City, they’re trying to put Wi-Fi hotspots into taxicabs, what I like to call ‘rogues on wheels.’ Each Wi-Fi taxi passing by your store is creating its own rogue AP alert.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.