advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

Wal-Mart’s Kiosk Trial Raises Serious PCI, Data Ownership Issues

May 27th, 2009

The company’s privacy statement says it might share information with law enforcement and third-party service providers that “may help us process information, extend credit, fulfill customer orders, deliver products to you, manage and enhance customer data, provide customer service, assess your interest in our products and services, or conduct customer research or satisfaction surveys.” The privacy policy notes that those companies “are also obligated to protect your personal information in accordance with e-Play’s privacy policies, except if we inform you otherwise at the time of collection,” and warns that disclosure of personal information might also be required due to litigation.

“There’ve been no discussions on selling customer information,” Rudy said. “I would be very hesitant to do that and we certainly wouldn’t do it without the permission of the consumer.” The CEO also said he’d fear angering host retailers by, for example, selling to competing retailers information cleaned from its kiosks. “I doubt our retail partners would be willing to work with us if we did that, so that’s why we won’t do it,” Rudy said.

Currently, accepting E-Play game-buying kiosks involves virtually no input from a retailer’s IT department if the units are set-up to pay money only by making deposits to credit or debit cards, as is the case in the initial Wal-Mart trial. Wal-Mart is remaining non-committal about its long-term interest in the machines and whether it would like them to offer Wal-Mart-specific forms of payment for the games that are purchased. “It’s too early to say or speculate at this time,” O’Brien said. “It’s a very small pilot. We are watching with great interest but we can’t speculate at this time how fast it will grow. For us, it’s a great service for customers and a convenience.”

Rudy said the company has game kiosks in some Wal-Mart Canada stores and in about 200 other locations, mainly Exxon and Speedway gas stations. He said E-Play has plans “with several partners” to implement a system where those who sell their games to the kiosks are issued a slip bearing a barcode they can take to the service desk. The barcode would be scanned to determine the amount of store credit available to the disk seller.

Greenleaf and O’Brien said public interest in the Wal-Mart kiosks has been high, particularly among gaming enthusiasts. O’Brien acknowledged many people are asking if there is, or ever will be, a way to get their game trade-in money in a gift card or other form that can be used immediately at the store. However, the retailer is taking a similar arms-length approach as that taken by Best Buy when it began testing kiosks last summer. “That’s a next generation we’re looking at, the in-store gift card credit,” Greenleaf said, noting “there certainly are other capabilities that e-Pay has in place with these machines” for paying game and movie sellers.

If any alternative payback method were instituted, it wouldn’t take place unless there is a future expansion of the kiosks to other Wal-Marts. “There isn’t currently an expansion plan (but) we’re optimistic about expansion and looking forward,” O’Brien said. She noted more E-Play kiosks will be installed, as part of the trial, before the end of May.


advertisement

3 Comments | Read Wal-Mart’s Kiosk Trial Raises Serious PCI, Data Ownership Issues

  1. Craig Keefner Says:

    Thanks for exploring these issues. Nice article. My guess is the credit card readers are standard HID and possibly keyboard wedge (though we hate to think that). Something to be said for the new magteks which actually do do the encoding of data at the head and eliminate encoding by software (and uses magensa service to decode). Those options might be gaining momentum just in terms of plausible denial so to speak.

  2. Atilla Ovundur Says:

    In Turkey, credit payment systems are really hard to implement in selfservice kiosk systems. Almost every bank has its own loyalty program and customers are very addictible for them. And also PCI and EMV rules are quite strong in payment systems. So Security and privacy is not first issue but integrity is main problem so as to solve.

  3. Roger van Maris Says:

    Interesting article! Dealing with big box stores can be difficult especially in balancing the visual perception of who is delivering the service in store. Point taken that WM will be on the hook for whatever the kiosk does or does not do, in the eyes of the public. It is essential to mesh the policies of the the host retailer with the policies of the provider. Trust of our clients can not be betrayed at any point or our kiosk projects will definately fail.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.