Want To Finally Move Beyond Magstripes? Fix The PIN Pad

Written by Frank Hayes
March 31st, 2012

Getting rid of payment cards’ aging and insecure magstripe is the real point behind the recent EMV mandates of Visa, MasterCard and Discover. Trouble is, those mandates won’t work if they merely require PIN pads that support contactless and contact EMV cards. Such PIN pads are already in many stores, and they give customers three separate ways to use their cards. And yet, customers overwhelmingly use the most familiar approach: the magstripe swipe.

There’s an easy way to overcome that customer (and cashier) inertia: a redesigned PIN pad that doesn’t feel much different to customers but still makes swipes obsolete.

What Visa says it wants is a POS system that doesn’t just accept magstripe, contact and contactless cards, but one that also figures out which approach accepted by the card processor will provide the highest available level of security. To do that, the card has to somehow signal to the PIN pad that it’s contactless, or that has an EMV chip, or that it only has a magstripe. That’s going to require lots of PIN-pad upgrades for retailers.

Unfortunately, once Visa and MasterCard have their way getting chains to do those upgrades, PIN pads will probably still look to customers much like they do today: The customer can tap a contactless card. The customer can insert a contact EMV card into a slot, typically located at the bottom of the POS device. Or the customer can slide the card through the magstripe reader along the top or side of the POS device.

What’s wrong with this picture? If you give customers (and, even more crucially, your associates) three different ways of using a card, they’ll choose the one that’s most familiar—and that’s always going to be a swipe. (Well, except for that tiny minority of customers who prefer a tap or tourists who only know Chip-and-PIN.)

So much for the idea that the POS can figure out which approach is the most secure.

But wait—let’s say extra information is embedded in each card’s magstripe to indicate what else it supports. Then if customers swipe by habit, the POS can indicate that the card could be used in contact or contactless mode. All that would require is for the cashier to explain that the customer needs to either tap the already-swiped card or put it into another slot. Then the cashier would have to explain why the customer should do that unfamiliar thing, especially when the customer knows the swipe worked.

Considering that a lack of cashier interest has been a big part of the failure of contactless at POS, how likely is that scenario to play out? As long as the three-way choice is there, customers will always pick a swipe.

The obvious solution: Only offer customers a single slot to put the card in.


One Comment | Read Want To Finally Move Beyond Magstripes? Fix The PIN Pad

  1. Joe Says:

    Until there is consistency in how these devices act in a large number of retailers, consumers are going to struggle with changes. There are so many devices out there today that most consumers are not sure how each type works.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.