What’s In A Question? Perhaps More Of Your Authentication Than You Realize

Written by Evan Schuman
February 10th, 2011

True story from a reader: A customer tries to log into his mobile phone account. He types his password several times, but he can’t get in, and eventually the account is locked. Must have mis-keyed either the login or password, he figures. No problem, though, because the system asks him to enter his phone number, and then asks a security question: “What is your favorite ice cream flavor?”

The customer doesn’t remember setting up this security question, but he guesses “vanilla.” That works, and the system asks him to enter a new password. Once that’s done, he has full access to the account—which he quickly discovers belongs to someone else, because he mistakenly typed in a phone number that’s off by one digit. Oops.

Retail IT spends lots of time and effort trying to get employees to use secure passwords. It’s harder to keep customers in line, but they can at least be prodded to choose longer, harder-to-guess passwords. Still, that’s all wasted effort if the fallback security challenge question is ludicrously simple to guess. Favorite sports team? Favorite restaurant? Favorite band? Favorite vegetable? There’s some security there. But favorite ice cream flavor? Way too easy.

For the record, vanilla is actually the favorite ice cream flavor of only 22 percent of Americans, according to a 2009 Harris poll. Vanilla wasn’t even the top pick; 27 percent named chocolate. That still makes either choice a likely answer for a decidedly lame security challenge.

Yes, passwords are the best security you’ve got for customers today, and longer and more complex is better—most of the time, anyway. And true, challenge questions will always be a relatively weak link in the security chain; a dedicated thief will do the research to discover the mother’s maiden name, high school mascot or first employer of a targeted victim. And yes, a security system that dumps the user of a locked account into a password reset system and then allows the user to re-select what account he’ll be resetting the password for, is hopelessly flawed anyway.

Still, it’s probably worth bolstering your second line of defense with a little more thought and creativity. That way, your customers’ long, complex passwords aren’t backed up by a challenge question that’s plain vanilla.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.