advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

Will Visa’s Support For EMV Mean Fewer QSAs?

August 10th, 2011

Security is improved because dynamic authentication can reduce card fraud, at least at the POS. Without going into a lot of detail, dynamic authentication means the payment device (i.e., a chip card or smartphone with NFC) generates a unique field for each transaction. Therefore, compromised card data will have much less value, at least in a POS environment.

Dynamic authentication is not possible with a (static) magnetic stripe, hence the push to move to chip cards and NFC-enabled devices like smartphones. What Visa is doing is providing an incentive for U.S. card merchants to implement the POS infrastructure that will enable dynamic authentication and, thereby, enable mobile commerce while reducing POS fraud.

Mobile payments will at least be positioned to take off if there are more merchant devices capable of accepting transactions initiated by them.

Lastly, EMV technology will be positioned to take off in the U.S. market with the deployment of more POS devices, together with the accompanying back-office enhancements.

As with any announcement, there are lots of unknowns and a few unanswered questions. The biggest question is: Will the other card brands go along with Visa? Visa may be the largest issuer, but it is not the only one. The value of TIP participation goes down pretty fast if merchants still need to pay for PCI assessments to satisfy the other card brands’ security programs. Another pretty significant question is whether the TIP incentives will be attractive to any but the very largest merchants. Where incentive interchange rates benefit every merchant that qualifies, TIP only seems to benefit the largest merchants.

Speaking as a cardholder who travels to Europe and other parts of the world where my mag-stripe card is viewed with a combination of disdain and pity, where I can’t use a kiosk to buy a train ticket or rent a bicycle and where I have to ask waiters to swipe my card yet again, I hope Visa succeeds. It is time to move on and stop trying to retrofit a half-century-old technology like the mag stripe to today’s E-Commerce, mobile commerce and security requirements.

EMV is far from perfect, and it is not a silver bullet for PCI. Maybe Visa’s leadership combined with incentives and a liability shift will get the U.S. market to move to EMV cards (at least by 2015, anyway). If it does, I can support that, even if it does mean I have to start polishing my resume.

What do you think? Can your POS devices handle both EMV chip cards and NFC? I’d like to hear your thoughts. Either leave a comment or E-mail me at wconway@403labs.com.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.