advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

You’ve Got A Mole Giving Away Your Sensitive Data

February 17th, 2010

The customer eats at this competitor’s restaurant at least a couple of times a week (in many cases, a couple of times a day). His average transaction is $7.25. He has also download dozens of iPhone apps in the last month, likes music by Norah Jones and rents mostly dramas on Netflix. I also notice that this person spends about $65 every couple of weeks at an Ethiopian restaurant. There is even a picture of this person, so I know what he looks like.

I’m “just the IT guy,” but that seems like some pretty nice information about my competitor’s business and about one of its most active customers. It seems like this information could be used to improve a company’s positioning with its competitors. But, more importantly, are your competitors using the information to better maneuver themselves around your business?

When I brought this question to Joel Bulger, the vice president of Marketing at Moe’s Southwest Grill, he said: “I guess what I’m not getting is, what is in it for the user to sign up? I don’t see any sort of ‘carrot.’ With the cost of getting consumer purchase information/patterns at an all-time high for marketers, I’m not sure why people would volunteer their information without any sort of compensation.”

As Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg has been quoted saying: “Privacy is no longer a social norm.” The same people who are OK posting pictures and videos of their drunken weekend on Facebook for the world to see (even their current or potential employers) don’t feel that it’s a big deal to share their purchases. In fact, it’s quite the contrary: They want their friends to know exactly what they’re buying, and they want their friends to reciprocate. It’s a form of social intimacy that might be akin to swapping private stories with your buddies at a neighborhood bar.

I also don’t believe that people think about the possibility of marketers looking at this information. Rather, I think many people are using this service as sort of a brag book for their friends. Some observers have suggested that people might use the Blippy site to set up false personas, potentially to impress people. Some guy might, for example, invite a woman he’s interested in to join his circle. He then uses his Blippy Card to buy an expensive suit, Mercedes-Benz keychains, The Vegetarian’s Guide To Improving The Planet’s Ecology and Why Women Really Should Be On A Pedestal. Meanwhile, he’d use another card or cash to buy fast-food hamburgers, cigarettes, cheap beer and porn.

I am surprised at how little attention this approach has generated with retailers. If Blippy does take off, retailers are going to have to learn to deal with what has traditionally been closely held information becoming widely available. I think that gut reactions will be along the lines of, “How can I get this shut off?” or “Who gave the credit card companies permission to provide my data?”

But let’s not forget that one of the site’s original goals is for people to share with their friends what they like and what they purchase. One person in a circle of friends who makes a purchase from a retailer may persuade dozens of other people to make a purchase from the same place. So each Blippy purchase is essentially a mini-endorsement for your brand. More importantly, this endorsement is coming from people who consumers trust–namely, their friends.

It remains to be seen whether Blippy will become a huge success or crash and burn. Arguably, the amount of data on the site is currently small. Some retailers may only have a dozen or so transactions, while others have hundreds or thousands. Obviously, smaller sample sets do not provide significant insight into a company. But if this site continues to grow, so will the value of the data it holds.

What do you think? Love it or hate it, I’d love to gain some additional perspectives. Leave a comment, or E-mail me at Todd.Michaud@FranchiseIT.org.


advertisement

One Comment | Read You’ve Got A Mole Giving Away Your Sensitive Data

  1. A reader Says:

    Why fight it when you can join it? If people are going to give away their opinions, their purchasing habits, their customer experiences, savvy retailers should be doing all they can to harvest and exploit this data.

    Right now retailers see trends only as they unfold in their own stores, or through expensive research. And they may be colored by their desire to see their own trends succeed. This is a chance to see a broader spectrum of data. And it may be best for the smaller retailers, the ones who can’t afford to carry a lot of inventory. If they can react quickly to trends that are selling elsewhere, they could really improve margins.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.