advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Can Price-Match Deals Work? Not Any More

September 26th, 2012

Asda obviously got burned by a badly designed promotion, but could any design save a price-match promotion today? Probably not. Even if you strip away the penny-priced clearance items, there will always be past-date or loss-leader items that bargain hunters can leverage. And with an avid crowd of bargain hunters, all it will take is a quick trip to a Web site—maybe even from a mobile phone while in the store’s aisle—to beat the system.

This is a price-database arms race, and customers will always be several steps ahead of chains. To be anything short of catastrophic, price-match promotions have to depend on increasing numbers of limitations and caveats that, ultimately, will irritate regular customers—exactly the opposite of what the promotion is supposed to do.

There’s a reason—a legally binding reason, it turns out—that Walmart had to dump its original slogan, “Always the low price. Always.” It just wasn’t possible for Walmart to always have the lowest price. Every time a competitor had a loss-leader or closeout or clearance item, that turned Walmart’s slogan into false advertising.

And that was in the days before price-comparison Web sites and instant customer price-intelligence.

There’s an irony here: Walmart recently came up with a very different sort of price-match gimmick that it’s testing in a few U.S. stores. In this case, shoppers scan their receipts from competitors into a Walmart Web site and then Walmart tells the customers how much they would have saved on certain items if the customers had shopped at Walmart.

That approach turns the Asda price-match on its head in almost every way. First, it doesn’t pay out any cash, so there’s no reason for “professional shoppers” to try to game the system. Second, it’s focused on the items where Walmart is cheaper, not where the competing store is cheaper, the way the Asda price-match worked.

Third—and maybe most important—it’s focused on people who aren’t Walmart customers, who have the receipt to show they already paid what are presumably higher prices. Those shoppers are prime candidates for a price-match program: they are already paying more somewhere else. You want to get those people into your stores. You don’t want to encourage people already shopping in your stores to spend less.

Price-match promotions used to work reasonably well as a way of luring customers. And there’s a tremendous temptation to update those price-match gimmicks to use all the price data that’s now available. As Asda discovered, though, that’s a sucker’s game. With real-time data available to customers as they stand in the aisle, customers are still going to be ahead of chains—and there’s probably no way chains can actually fix the problems. When you can’t win, it’s time to stop playing the game.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.